Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40745317›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal for equity in health2025

Policies and guidelines supporting the sustainability of human milk donation to milk banks in Switzerland: a document analysis.

Christelle Kaech, Tracy Humphrey, Catherine Kilgour, Céline Julie Fischer Fumeaux, Claire de Labrusse

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christelle KaechSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia. c.kaech@student.uq.edu.au.
Tracy HumphreySchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Catherine KilgourSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Céline Julie Fischer Fumeaux *Department Mother-Woman-Child, Clinic of Neonatology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Claire de Labrusse *HESAV School of Health Sciences - Vaud, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDonor milk from a human milk bank is recommended for vulnerable infants when the mother’s own milk is scarce. Globally, despite an increasing number of human milk banks, the demand for donor milk exceeds the supply, and access remains inequitable and insufficient. The objective of this document analysis was to investigate how global (universal), European, and national policies and guidelines support the sustainability of human milk donation in Switzerland.

methodsDatabase searches of Medline (via PubMed) and CINAHL were completed in June 2024. Eight documents were included: three guidelines, two position papers/consensus statements, two toolkits and one document with policy recommendations. The analysis was constructed around the micro (individual), meso (institutional) and macro (healthcare system and policies) level framework of structures and systems.

resultsGlobal and European documents offered general recommendations that can be flexibly adapted for each location. Global documents contained explicit recommendations related to sustainability for donations mainly at the macro and meso levels, whereas European documents recommendations related to factors influencing sustainability of human milk donation at all three levels. Swiss guidelines primarily addressed the meso level through specific recommendations adapted to the national context. Regarding sustainability and its three pillars, the majority of the identified recommendations focused on the social pillar. The economic pillar was moderately addressed, whereas the environmental pillar—encompassing issues such as milk wastage, contamination, pollution associated with single-used plastics and broader environmental impacts—was largely overlooked.

conclusionsThe sustainability of human milk donation is addressed inconsistently in current global, European and national guidelines on human milk banking. Some documents provide multiple explicit recommendations across different levels, while others refer to the sustainability of donation only implicitly. Future work and research should consider providing a coherent framework across policy, organisational and behavioural levels to enhance the sustainability of human milk donation.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicMilk BanksMilk, HumanDocument AnalysisFemaleHumansSwitzerlandDocument analysisDonation sustainabilityGuidelines and policiesMilk bankingSystematic qualitative review

Identifiers

PMID40745317
PMCPMC12312558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.