ArticlePediatric rheumatology online journal2025
Feasibility of applying infrared thermal imaging for home monitoring of arthritis in children.
Article in Pediatric rheumatology online journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Texture-enhanced thermography for joint inflammation detection using consumer-grade thermal cameras.PloS one · 2026Article
- Clinical Utility of Infrared Thermography in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review of Surgical and Nonsurgical Applications.Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric SurgeonsReview
- Heat for Healing: A Review of Infrared Thermography in Medical Diagnostics and Therapy.Journal of medical physicsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTelemedicine has improved access to pediatric rheumatology care. A disadvantage to using virtual modality for evaluation of children with arthritis is the lack of an in-person, hands-on physical exam. Thermal imaging has been studied in the clinical setting with promising results. This study aims to determine the feasibility of procuring at-home thermal imaging, measuring the variability of in-home skin temperature measurements over three consecutive days, and to compare these measurements at home to ones obtained in the clinic setting.
methodsChildren with knee pain and/or swelling for a week or longer were enrolled and imaged with a smartphone-attached FLIR ONE PRO and Fluke handheld cameras followed by imaging with a FLIR camera at home for 3 consecutive days. Joint exam performed in the office was used as gold standard for joint assessment. A previously validated metric of temperature after within-limb calibration (TAWiC), defined as the temperature differences between the knee joint and ipsilateral mid-tibia, was used for all imaging studies.
resultsFifty-three patients were enrolled and thirty-eight completed the imaging acquisition at home with analyzable images. When evaluating images of the knee and mid-tibia regions, images collected at home compared to in-office demonstrated consistently lower absolute temperatures. However, the calibrated temperatures (TAWiC) of the anterior and lateral views of the knee showed mild to moderate correlation across 3 days between home-acquired images and office-acquired images (r = 0.58, 0.26, 0.24 and r = 0.36, 0.41, 0.42, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of detecting arthritis of the knee using TAWiC adjustments from previously defined thresholds were similar regardless of the setting of image acquisition (0.44 and 0.79).
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the feasibility of applying TAWiC for arthritis detection through a smartphone-based infrared thermal camera operated by families at home. Further investigation on a larger scale is needed prior to implementation of this process in the telemedicine setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.