ArticlePopulation health metrics2025
Patient-centred estimation of multimorbidity in chronic disease populations: a novel approach integrating global burden of disease metrics and healthcare administrative data.
Article in Population health metrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough chronic diseases represent a growing global health priority, significant gaps remain in understanding the burden of multimorbidity. This study developed an original methodology to estimate the burden of thirty major chronic diseases at the individual patient level, in terms of Disability-Adjusted Life years (DALYs), Years Lived with Disability (YLD), and Years of Life Lost due to premature death (YLL).
methodsThe Disability weights (DWs) estimated by the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study were integrated with information from healthcare databases. A panel of medical specialists established the criteria for assigning the level of severity, and thus a specific DW, to each chronic disease. The patient-centred YLD metric was estimated as the cumulative of the combined DWs over the previous ten years. We also measured the Disability Weight Fraction of each coexisting disease (DWF). We illustrated this method using healthcare databases from a large Italian region to assess the impact of chronic diseases and multimorbidity at progressive levels of analysis: health status of the regional chronic disease population, burden of individual chronic diseases and patient clinical complexity.
resultsUnlike the standard GBD estimates, the new method provided precise metrics for multimorbidity, as shown by the comparison on the disability calculated for 4 main chronic diseases. Real-world estimates from the new method highlighted that comorbidity accounted for most of the YLD: for instance, about 88% of the YLD of patients with heart failure was explained by concomitant conditions. DALYs were higher among females than males in most age groups. In the younger groups, psychiatric conditions explained approximately 40% and 25% of YLD among males and females, respectively. Finally, the patient-centred YLD metric was a good predictor of death (c-statistic = 0.779).
conclusionsThis novel method provides insights into the measurement of multimorbidity, based on the disability fraction of each concomitant health condition, which is crucial for defining priority areas for healthcare interventions. The patient-centred estimates may serve to identify subgroups of chronic disease patients with specific healthcare needs and trajectories among a given population. Importantly, measuring the relative contribution of each disease to the patient's burden of multimorbidity favours the planning of multidisciplinary care pathways that are more responsive to individual needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.