ArticleBMC genomic data2025
A comparison of normalization methods for the expression of genes associated with oxidative stress in the liver of sheep.
Article in BMC genomic data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genomic Signatures of Selection Are Enriched in Differentially Expressed Genes in Sticklebacks Adapting to Contrasting Environments.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNormalization of data obtained from RT-qPCR studies is important for accurate interpretation of the results. The two most common methods of normalization that are used are the reference gene method or an algorithm-only approach, such as NORMA-Gene. Here, we assessed the impact of normalization using reference genes or the NORMA-Gene method on the expression results of five target genes that are related to oxidative stress (CAT, GPX1, GPX3, PRDX1, and SOD1) in the liver of sheep that had been exposed to three dietary treatments.
resultsThe reference genes selected as the most stable across samples for normalization were HPRT1, HSP90AA1, and B2M. Interpretation of the effect of the treatment on the expression of GPX3 differed significantly between the methods of normalization. NORMA-Gene was better at reducing the variance in the expression of the target genes than was any of the other normalization methods.
conclusionsWe demonstrated that NORMA-Gene can provide a more reliable normalization method that requires less resources than the use of reference genes for studies on gene expression in livestock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.