Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40745265›Full record

ArticleBMC genomic data2025

A comparison of normalization methods for the expression of genes associated with oxidative stress in the liver of sheep.

Sarah Babington, Luoyang Ding, Alan J Tilbrook, Shane K Maloney, Dominique Blache

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomic data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah BabingtonSchool of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
Luoyang DingSchool of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
Alan J TilbrookSchool of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, 4343, Australia.
Shane K MaloneySchool of Human Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
Dominique BlacheSchool of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia. dominique.blache@uwa.edu.au.

Funding

Meat and Livestock Australia P.PSH.1232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNormalization of data obtained from RT-qPCR studies is important for accurate interpretation of the results. The two most common methods of normalization that are used are the reference gene method or an algorithm-only approach, such as NORMA-Gene. Here, we assessed the impact of normalization using reference genes or the NORMA-Gene method on the expression results of five target genes that are related to oxidative stress (CAT, GPX1, GPX3, PRDX1, and SOD1) in the liver of sheep that had been exposed to three dietary treatments.

resultsThe reference genes selected as the most stable across samples for normalization were HPRT1, HSP90AA1, and B2M. Interpretation of the effect of the treatment on the expression of GPX3 differed significantly between the methods of normalization. NORMA-Gene was better at reducing the variance in the expression of the target genes than was any of the other normalization methods.

conclusionsWe demonstrated that NORMA-Gene can provide a more reliable normalization method that requires less resources than the use of reference genes for studies on gene expression in livestock.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingLiverOxidative StressAnimalsGlutathione PeroxidaseReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReference StandardsSheepGlutathione PeroxidaseGene expressionNORMA-GeneOvineReference genesRT-qPCR

Identifiers

PMID40745265
PMCPMC12312509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.