Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40745251›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2026

Learning-dependent modulation of working memory.

Frida A B Printzlau, Athanasios Bourganos, Keisuke Fukuda, Michael L Mack

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Frida A B PrintzlauDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, University of Toronto, 100 St George Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G3, Canada. frida.printzlau@utoronto.ca.
Athanasios BourganosDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, University of Toronto, 100 St George Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G3, Canada.
Keisuke FukudaDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, University of Toronto, 100 St George Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G3, Canada.
Michael L MackDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, University of Toronto, 100 St George Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G3, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Category knowledge helps us make inferences and decisions but may also bias how information is perceived and remembered. Previous studies have reported categorical biases in working memory (WM), but mostly for highly familiar features with category structure established through life-long exposure (e.g., colour). Key unanswered questions are how quickly category biases arise following new learning and how biases are shaped by the nature of prior experience. Across three experiments, we asked how new category learning biases WM reports (total N = 180). Participants learned to categorise novel shapes in a brief training session (10-15 min). Training either emphasised category prototypes (Experiment 1) or the category boundary (Experiment 2). Following learning, they performed a two-item WM task where category was irrelevant. New category learning modulated WM-guided behaviour in two ways. First, training improved WM accuracy for the most familiar areas of feature space. Second, we found category-dependent bias of WM reports following training that stressed category prototypes but not category boundaries, compared to a control experiment with no learning (Experiment 3). Category bias scaled with the distance from the category boundary and was driven by trials when memory items belonged to distinct categories. Our results show that even newly learned categories may act as priors for WM, but biases may depend on the specific nature of prior experiences.

Indexed as

Concept FormationLearningMemory, Short-TermPattern Recognition, VisualAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultBiasCategory learningLong-term memoryPrior experienceWorking memory

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.