ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Multilevel injuries of the upper and lower legs : Strategies for osteosynthetic treatment].
Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMultilevel fractures are breaks of a single bone at multiple levels, often as a combination of diaphyseal and metaphyseal sections. They are usually caused by the effect of strong direct force. Combined injuries of a bone are fractures accompanied by joint distortion. This results in ligament ruptures or avulsions together with a shaft fracture. Surgical treatment is always challenging and requires a differentiated approach.
objectiveThe aim of this review article is to highlight the diagnostic and surgical procedures for multilevel fractures. Particular attention is paid to the importance of the fracture location and joint involvement in order to ensure targeted treatment for functional restoration. MATERIAL AND
methodsA literature search was conducted to identify possible treatment strategies. In addition, clinical case studies from our own patient population were reviewed and discussed. RESULTS AND
conclusionMultilevel injuries rarely occur in both the femur and tibia. In cases of compromised soft tissue or unstable cardiac circulation, external fixation is the primary treatment. For femoral fractures all-in-one, miss-a-nail or rendezvous techniques are common options for definitive treatment. In multilevel fractures of the tibia, the strategy depends on the involvement of the joint. Anatomical joint reconstruction is the top priority. The goal in shaft fractures is always to restore the axis, length and rotation. An accompanying fibular shaft fracture can be indicative of a fracture of the upper ankle joint. Restoration of ankle joint congruency is then essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40745230What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.