ArticleMolecular diversity2026
Machine learning-based design, screening, and activity validation of topoisomerase I inhibitors.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Topoisomerase I (TOP I) plays a vital role in maintaining genomic stability and regulating cellular proliferation. Its overexpression in aggressive cancers such as lung, pancreatic, and breast malignancies highlights its value as a therapeutic target. However, the current TOP I inhibitors face limitations including poor hydrolytic stability, significant toxicity, and the emergence of drug resistance. To address these issues, this study developed a comprehensive QSAR framework that goes beyond traditional methods restricted by limited descriptors or single algorithms. A dataset of 550 high-activity compounds from ChEMBL, BindingDB, and Topscience was systematically screened to build thirty QSAR models combining five molecular fingerprint types with six advanced machine learning algorithms. An optimized artificial neural network model was then employed to rationally design 5938 candidate inhibitors using the sequential attachment-based fragment embedding (SAFE) methodology. These candidates underwent rigorous evaluation through activity prediction, drug-likeness assessment, and ADMET profiling, resulting in seven promising compounds. Among them, three were experimentally validated by MTT cytotoxicity assays, while four novel compounds were further characterized by molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations. This integrative approach provides a robust theoretical foundation for the rational design and optimization of TOP I inhibitors, facilitating the development of targeted therapies against TOP I-associated cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40745150What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.