Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40745140›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2025

Drosophila as a Model for Metastasis.

Patricia Montes-Labrador, Kyra Campbell, Andreu Casali

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Patricia Montes-LabradorDepartament de Ciències Mèdiques Bàsiques, Universitat de Lleida, Lleida, Spain.
Kyra CampbellSchool of Biosciences, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. kyra.campbell@sheffield.ac.uk.
Andreu CasaliDepartament de Ciències Mèdiques Bàsiques, Universitat de Lleida, Lleida, Spain. andreu.casali@udl.cat.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastasis, the spread of cancer from the primary tumor to distant sites, accounts for the majority of cancer-related deaths. This complex process involves tumor cell detachment, invasion into surrounding tissues, entry into blood vessels, survival in circulation, and colonization of secondary sites. Key factors in metastasis include changes in cell proliferation, loss of anchorage dependence, and activation of oncogenic pathways. While much has been learned from mammalian models, particularly mice, many aspects remain poorly understood. The Drosophila model offers unique advantages, with its powerful genetic tools, whole-organism imaging capabilities, and insights into host-tumor interactions, to advance our knowledge of the key processes that drive metastatic events. Multispecies approaches, including Drosophila, are essential for advancing our understanding of metastasis and may lead to breakthroughs not achievable through single-species studies.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsAnimalsHumansCirculating tumor cellsInvasionMetastatic cascadeMicroenvironmentPrimary tumorSecondary tumor

Identifiers

PMID40745140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.