ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2025
Host-Microbe Interactions in Drosophila Cancer.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dysbiosis, the imbalance of an organism's commensal microbiota, may drive dysplasia and tumorigenesis via aberrant immune response, increased inflammation, and stem cell overactivation. The Drosophila gut is a useful model to study host-microbiota interactions leading to tumorigenesis due to its molecular, cellular, and physiological similarity with the human gut and its simplicity at the host and microbiome levels. A primary lesson learned from Drosophila gut studies is that microbiota and pathogenic microbes, such as bacteria and viruses, induce multiple innate immune and stress signaling pathways in enterocytes and other gut cells that, in turn, activate mitogens driving regenerative stem cell proliferation. A second important lesson learned from Drosophila gut studies is that wild-type and genetically predisposed intestinal epithelial cells are more likely to initiate tumorigenesis and tissue invasion upon interaction with intestinal microbes. Lastly, microbial nutrients may directly affect intestinal stem cell proliferation and tissue regeneration. This review discusses the mechanisms by which the microbiome influences directly and indirectly stem cell proliferation, tumorigenesis, and tumor cell dissemination, shedding light on microbiota-mediated cancer predisposition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40745139What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.