ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2026
Weather information improves a predictive model of emergency department arrivals.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting the Unpredictable: A Data-Driven Machine Learning Model for Emergency Department Waiting Room Surge Status.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Variable emergency department (ED) volumes contribute to staffing challenges. Weather may impact ED arrival patterns. Enhancing prediction of arrivals based on weather conditions may be useful for operational planning, including adaptation to climate change. In this retrospective analysis of ED arrivals from an urban teaching hospital in the Northeast US from 2010 to 2019, two linear regression models were developed to predict daily arrival totals. The base model utilized calendar variables and a 28-day rolling average of daily arrival totals. The second model added weather variables. Models were tested for overfitting using training and test datasets, and residuals were plotted. Addition of weather variables to the model increased adjusted R-squared (0.418 to 0.483). Effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals for predictor variables in the final model were scaled to the mean daily arrival total (152.7) to facilitate interpretation. Monday was predictive of the most arrivals (+ 23.1%, CI + 22.0% to + 24.2%), relative to Sunday (reference). Holidays were associated with fewer arrivals (- 14.2%, CI - 15.9% to - 12.4%). Inclement weather was associated with fewer arrivals. Increases in the relative maximum daily temperature were associated with increases in arrivals. The effect of temperature varied across seasons. Inclusion of weather variables improved predictive value of a model of daily ED arrivals in this single-site, retrospective analysis. Rain, snow, and wind were associated with reduced arrivals, while warmer temperatures relative to historical averages were associated with increased arrivals. Inclusion of weather variables into models of ED utilization may support improved operational decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.