ArticleClinical rheumatology2025
Multi-omics identification of circulating protein biomarkers for intervertebral disc degeneration using Mendelian randomization and scRNA-seq.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-omics Mendelian randomization prioritizes BMP6 as a candidate therapeutic target in intervertebral disc degeneration.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) is a primary cause of chronic low back pain, significantly impacting quality of life and healthcare systems globally. Despite its prevalence, the molecular mechanisms underlying IVDD remain unclear, and effective biomarkers are lacking. This study aims to identify circulating protein biomarkers causally linked to IVDD and explore their potential as biomarkers.
methodsA proteome-wide Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was conducted using data from 4907 circulating proteins to assess their causal relationships with IVDD, utilizing the FinnGen cohort. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) was performed to evaluate the expression patterns of identified proteins in healthy and degenerated disc tissues. Additionally, machine learning models were employed to rank these proteins based on their therapeutic potential.
resultsEight circulating proteins (CD96, CDH3, COPS2, DDX23, FAM210A, PNPO, STOML2, and UBE2D2) were identified as statistically associated with IVDD. scRNA-seq analysis demonstrated differential expression patterns between healthy and degenerated tissues, with COPS2 and UBE2D2 achieving the highest classification accuracy for distinguishing tissue states (AUC = 0.85). Functional and pathway analyses highlighted their roles in inflammation, extracellular matrix regulation, and cellular stress responses.
conclusionsThis study integrates multi-omics approaches to uncover novel protein biomarkers for IVDD, with COPS2 and UBE2D2 showing promising potential as biomarkers or mechanistic targets. Further in vivo validation studies are warranted to confirm their clinical relevance and therapeutic applicability. Key Points • This study utilized Mendelian randomization and single-cell RNA sequencing to identify eight circulating proteins causally associated with IVDD. • The application of machine learning models revealed COPS2 and UBE2D2 as top contributors with high classification accuracy in distinguishing healthy and degenerated disc tissues. • Comprehensive multi-omics and pathway analysis highlighted COPS2 and UBE2D2 as promising therapeutic targets for IVDD, warranting further in vivo validation. • Enrichment analyses identified significant immune-related pathways, underscoring inflammation's critical role in IVDD progression and providing avenues for targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40745068What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.