Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40745058›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2025

A cross-national analysis of demographic variation in self-rated mental health across 22 countries.

Chukwuemeka N Okafor, Ducel Jean-Berluche, Jason Paltzer, Elizabeth Kwon, Nikolitsa Grigoropoulou, Tyler J VanderWeele, Byron R Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chukwuemeka N OkaforDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. okaforcn@uthscsa.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6080-4866
Ducel Jean-BerlucheDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-9249-7646
Jason PaltzerThe Meros Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Elizabeth KwonDepartment of Public Health, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7926-5532
Nikolitsa GrigoropoulouSOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4250-1941
Tyler J VanderWeeleDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6112-0239
Byron R JohnsonHuman Flourishing Program, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health is a critical aspect of overall well-being, encompassing not only the absence of mental disorders but also positive attributes such as stress management, and healthy relationships. Prior studies suggest that self-rated mental health varies across different cultures and sociodemographic characteristics. However, most studies on demographic variations in self-rated mental health have been conducted within specific countries or regions, leaving a gap in our understanding of how these factors influence mental health across different cultural contexts.

methodsTo address this gap, we leveraged a dataset of over 200,000 individuals from 22 countries to examine the distribution of self-rated mental health among key demographic variables such as age, gender, marital status, employment, education, and religious service attendance.

resultsOur findings reveal substantial country variations in self-rated mental health, measured as the mean score on a single-item Likert scale ranging from 0 (Poor) to 10 (Excellent). Participants in Tanzania, Kenya and Nigeria report the highest self-rated mental health scores, while those in Japan, Türkiye, and the United Kingdom report the lowest scores. Some demographic patterns - such as lower self-rated mental health among younger age groups and females, and higher self-rated mental health among those reporting regular religious service attendance - remain consistent across most countries. However, other patterns, such as the distribution of self-rated mental health by marital status, vary by country.

conclusionsThese descriptive findings highlight the need for context-specific mental health strategies and call for future research to identify social and structural factors of self-rated mental health.

Identifiers

PMID40745058
PMCPMC12313904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.