Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40745005›Full record

ReviewExperimental & molecular medicine2025

Gene editing and CRISPR-dependent homology-mediated end joining.

Brian L Ruis, Anja K Bielinsky, Eric A Hendrickson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental & molecular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Precision Genome Engineering in Human Disease: Expanding Therapeutic Roles of CRISPR Technologies.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brian L RuisDepartment of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Anja K BielinskyDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Eric A HendricksonDepartment of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. Duk9mc@virginia.edu.

Funding

Mechanisms of mitotic regulationR35GM148181 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI P. TODD STUKENBERG · 2023 to 2026
$2.9M
Mechanistic insight into genome stability pathwaysR35GM141805 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Anja-Katrin Bielinsky · 2021 to 2026
$2.9M
POLQ- and CtIP-regulated telomere fusions and translocations are involved in early events in carcinogenesisR01CA266524 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HENDRICKSON, ERIC A · 2022 to 2025
$2.5M
Mechanism of radial chromosome formation in human premature aging syndrome cellsR21AG077174 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI BIELINSKY, ANJA-KATRIN, HENDRICKSON, ERIC A · 2023 to 2024
$444k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA266524NIA NIH HHS R21 AG077174NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM141805NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM148181U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R35GM148181U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI) CA266254
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene editing is the intentional modification of a genetic locus in a living cell and is used for two general applications of great importance and wide interest. One is the inactivation of genes ('knockouts'), a process utilized to delineate the loss-of-function phenotype(s) of a particular gene. The second application ('knock-ins') is essentially the process of gene therapy, which predominately involves correcting a pre-existing mutated allele(s) of a gene back to wild-type to ameliorate some pathological phenotype associated with the mutation. Importantly, although these applications are conceptually exact reciprocal opposites of one another, they are achieved via mechanistically different pathways. In the case of knockouts, breakage (usually in the form of double-stranded breaks) of the chromosomal DNA at the site of targeting is used to engage a repair process (nonhomologous end joining) that is error prone. The ensuing repair frequently results in insertions/deletions at the cleavage site, which, in turn, results in out-of-frame mutations and, hence, a knockout of the gene in question. In the case of knock-ins, breakage (again, usually in the form of double-stranded breaks) of the DNA is used to engage a repair process (homology-dependent repair/recombination) in which homologous sequences between an incoming donor DNA (containing new genetic information) and the chromosomal DNA are exchanged. Although homology-directed repair was known to predominate in bacteria and lower eukaryotes, the competing process of nonhomologous end joining predominates in higher eukaryotes and was presumed to prevent the use of knock-in gene editing in human somatic cells in culture. A series of molecular and technical advances disproved this notion but still resulted in a process that was cumbersome, labor intensive, highly inefficient and slow. In 2013, however, a new RNA-programmable nuclease, CRISPR-Cas9 was described that has revolutionized the field and made gene editing accessible to anyone with even a rudimentary knowledge of molecular biology. Thus, gene editing in a wide variety of model organisms, as well as human somatic cells in culture, has become not only extremely feasible but also extremely facile, and it harbingers a golden age for directed mutagenesis, directed evolution and improvements in gene therapy.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA End-Joining RepairGene EditingAnimalsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedHumans

Identifiers

PMID40745005
PMCPMC12322213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.