ReviewExperimental & molecular medicine2025
Live genome imaging by CRISPR engineering: progress and problems.
Review in Experimental & molecular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- CRISPR-Cas-based live cell imaging of genome dynamics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- OptoLoop - an optogenetic tool to probe the functional role of genome organization.Journal of cell science · 2026Article
- Illuminating the genome: emerging approaches in CRISPR-Cas live-cell imaging.Nucleic acids research · 2026Review
- Challenges in visualizing endogenousBiotechnologia · 2026Review
- BRIGHT Enables High-SNR Live-Cell Imaging of Non-Repetitive Sequences via Bivalent Fluorescent Nanobody-Mediated Cascade-Dependent Illumination.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Visualizing genetic information flow in space and time.Science China. Life sciences · 2025Review
- OptoLoop: An optogenetic tool to probe the functional role of genome organization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Ballistic Microscopy (BaM).bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CRISPR-Cas-based genome imaging opened a new era of genome visualization in living cells. While genomic loci with repetitive sequences, such as centromeres and telomeres, can be reliably imaged, applying the technique to nonrepetitive genomic loci has remained challenging. Recent advancements in the design of CRISPR RNAs and Cas proteins, the development of novel fluorophores and the combination of CRISPR-Cas with other molecular machinery amplified target-specific signals and suppressed background signals, revolutionizing this unique genome imaging technique and enabling the tracking of genomic loci with a small number of CRISPR-Cas complexes, down to a single complex. Here we review the latest advancements in CRISPR-Cas-based genome imaging techniques and their application to imaging nonrepetitive genomic loci. The challenges that these techniques are currently facing are the cellular toxicity and genomic instability induced by the expression of CRISPR-Cas and its interference with DNA metabolism, which impacts DNA replication and genome maintenance. Recently reported adverse effects of CRISPR-Cas-based genome labeling are discussed here, along with perspectives on how to overcome the problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.