ArticleScientific reports2025
A pilot study on the hemodynamic effects of negative pressure ventilation in patients after cardiac surgery focussing on right ventricular function.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Right ventricular dysfunction and right ventricular failure are important complications in cardiac surgical patients and typically observed after complex surgical cases. Treatment options for optimizing the hemodynamic status in patients presenting with these complications are limited. Negative pressure ventilation has been shown to ameliorate the effects of conventional positive pressure ventilation (PPV) and to improve cardiac output in patients with Fontan circulation and patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. No data are available on the effects of negative pressure ventilation on systemic hemodynamics and right heart function after complex on-pump cardiac surgery. Hypothesis of the present study is that right ventricular function improves under condition of negative pressure ventilation after complex on-pump surgery. Thirty patients after complex cardiac surgery were examined using basic hemodynamic monitoring, transesophageal ultrasound, a 3rd generation pulmonary artery catheter, cerebral oximetry and arterial and venous blood gases. The first 15 patients were ventilated for 15 min using standard PPV followed by 15 min of extrathoracal continuous negative pressure ventilation (CNPV) combined with PPV, and 15 min of extrathoracal biphasic negative pressure ventilation (BCV, biphasic cuirass ventilation) combined with an as far as possible reduced PPV. In the second 15 patients, the sequence of negative pressure ventilation was changed and BCV was performed before CNPV. Finally, every patient was ventilated for 15 min with standard PPV again. A full dataset of hemodynamics and a respiratory dataset was collected during each observation period. CNPV und BCV reduced central venous pressure and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure by 2 mmHg. During BCV cardiac index increased by + 24% (+ 0.5 l/min/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.