Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40744960›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Short-term responses of ground-dwelling arthropod communities to habitat loss and fragmentation in experimental mesoscale landscapes.

Cécile H Albert, Olivier Blight, Benoît Geslin, Natan Huberson, Lenka Brousset, Hélène de Méringo, Victorine Demiralp, Matthieu Jurado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cécile H Albert *Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, IRD, Avignon univ, IMBE, Aix-en-Provence, France. cecile.albert@imbe.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0991-1068
Olivier Blight *Avignon Univ, Aix Marseille univ, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Avignon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6072-9974
Benoît Geslin *Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, IRD, Avignon univ, IMBE, Aix-en-Provence, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2464-7998
Natan Huberson *Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, IRD, Avignon univ, IMBE, Aix-en-Provence, France.
Lenka BroussetAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, IRD, Avignon univ, IMBE, Aix-en-Provence, France.
Hélène de MéringoAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, IRD, Avignon univ, IMBE, Aix-en-Provence, France.
Victorine DemiralpAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, IRD, Avignon univ, IMBE, Aix-en-Provence, France.
Matthieu JuradoAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, IRD, Avignon univ, IMBE, Aix-en-Provence, France.

Funding

European Research Council ERC STG SCALED no. 949812
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Habitat loss and fragmentation are main drivers of biodiversity decline. However, disentangling their respective effects remains tricky and contrasting results have emerged in previous studies leading to a call for finely designed landscape-scale experiments that compare different levels of habitat fragmentation at fixed habitat loss, and that for different levels of habitat loss. Here we present early-stage results from MESOLAND, a new landscape-scale experiment designed to monitor the response of ground-dwelling arthropod communities to habitat loss and fragmentation, focusing on their short-term responses. Our experiment took place in a dry grassland in France, with natural stone cover representing the habitat and bare soil with stone cover manually removed being the matrix. We thus created experimental landscapes with nine levels of habitat loss (from 0 to 99%) combined with three levels of fragmentation (low, medium, high). Ground-dwelling arthropod communities were monitored using dry pitfall traps during six non-lethal capture sessions. In the months following habitat removal, we observed a drop in the number of captured arthropods with increasing habitat loss. Humidity-dependant groups such as woodlice and silverfish were affected. We observed no effect of habitat fragmentation at any level of habitat loss and no interactive effect with habitat amount. Early-stage results following the implementation of the MESOLAND experiment indicate that habitat loss has a greater effect than habitat fragmentation on ground-dwelling arthropods communities. We expect detecting further effects in the years to come, as most species will have completed several life cycles. The results of this experiment will contribute to the ongoing debate on habitat loss versus fragmentation, providing essential knowledge for applied spatial conservation.

Indexed as

ArthropodsEcosystemAnimalsBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesFranceGrasslandDry grasslandExperimental landscapesHabitat amountSpecies evennessTaxonomic diversityTaxonomic richness

Identifiers

PMID40744960
PMCPMC12314002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.