Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40744940›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

Protest in times of change. The PROTEiCA project survey.

Daniel Romero-Portillo, Manuel Jiménez-Sánchez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel Romero-PortilloDepartment of Sociology, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain. drompor@upo.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2852-9323
Manuel Jiménez-SánchezDepartment of Sociology, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5479-8511

Funding

Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness | Agencia Estatal de Investigación (Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigación) CS2017-84861-P-
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper introduces the PROTEiCA project survey, a dataset designed to explore the normalization of protest participation and the societal impact of large-scale demonstrations. The survey, conducted in 2019, provides a representative sample of the Spanish population aged 18 and over, focusing on the International Women's Day protests-among the largest mobilizations in Spain's history-and their political and social significance. The dataset includes variables on protest participation, and public perceptions of recent and historical mobilizations, enabling robust analyses of contentious events and their effects. This paper outlines the construction of the dataset, detailing the questionnaire design, the cross-sectional methodology with daily tracking over 20 days, and the administration strategy. Key insights into the dataset's value and potential applications for both expert and non-expert researchers are provided, highlighting its contribution to understanding protest normalization and the dynamics of societal change. By making this innovative dataset accessible, the PROTEiCA survey aims to support and inspire future research, fostering new insights into the dynamics of social movements and collective action.

Identifiers

PMID40744940
PMCPMC12313950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.