Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40744796›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of anaesthesia2025

Epinephrine, absorption, and local anaesthetic systemic toxicity: insights from continuous fascial block pharmacokinetic models.

Alessandro De Cassai, Burhan Dost, Giulia Mormando, Carla Stecco

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alessandro De CassaiDepartment of Medicine-DIMED, University of Padua, Padua, Italy; Institute of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy. Electronic address: alessandro.decassai@unipd.it.
Burhan DostDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.
Giulia MormandoDepartment of Medicine-DIMED, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Carla SteccoDepartment of Neuroscience, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fascial plane blocks have become increasingly popular owing to their technical ease and inclusion in postoperative analgesia guidelines, although uncertainties about their mechanisms and safety remain. A recent study of the impact of epinephrine on levobupivacaine pharmacokinetics in continuous fascial plane blocks proposes a potential safe dosing threshold and highlights the role of epinephrine in reducing systemic absorption. The study presents promising findings that advance our understanding of local anaesthetic pharmacokinetics in fascial blocks while raising important questions about drug absorption, patient-specific risk factors for local anaesthetic systemic toxicity, and the incompletely understood microanatomy of fascial tissues.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalEpinephrineFasciaNerve BlockVasoconstrictor AgentsBupivacaineHumansLevobupivacaineModels, BiologicalAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineEpinephrineLevobupivacaineVasoconstrictor Agentserector spinae plane blockfascialocal anaestheticpharmacokineticssafetytoxicitytransversus abdominus plane block

Identifiers

PMID40744796
PMCPMC12674052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.