Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40744651›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2025

Conceptualisation and design of a protocol for a novel social drivers and primary care screening tool in paediatric orthopaedics: a quality improvement initiative.

Devika A Shenoy, Kathryn Radulovacki, Christian Zirbes, Rachelle Shao, Giussepe Yanez, Anthony A Catanzano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Devika A ShenoyDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA devika.shenoy@duke.edu.ORCID 0009-0006-7543-5414
Kathryn RadulovackiDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-1898-7603
Christian ZirbesDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4015-9695
Rachelle ShaoDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8772-8269
Giussepe YanezDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4832-8016
Anthony A CatanzanoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7418-9561

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPaediatric patients with elevated healthcare needs have limited access to care, contributing to insufficient preventive services. Social drivers of health (SDOH), such as inadequate nutrition and poor community support, contribute substantially to paediatric health. In order to promote value-based healthcare, specialty providers like orthopaedic surgeons can serve as an entry point to connect patients to SDOH and primary care resources. The purpose of this short report is to provide a framework for other institutions for an ongoing screening programme. OVERVIEW OF PROGRAMME: Informed on prior initiatives, we designed a systematic screening programme for SDOH, obesity (via body mass index (BMI)) and primary care access in a paediatric orthopaedics clinic, for English-speaking and Spanish-speaking patients <18 years old. We record age, sex, race/ethnicity, language, orthopaedic condition, Area Deprivation Index and Childhood Opportunity Index from the electronic record previsit. BMI ≥95th percentile triggers referral to a paediatric obesity management programme. An institutional SDOH screen detects financial, food, transportation, housing and utility needs. A positive screen triggers a referral to institution and state-specific resources. A five-question Primary Care Access Screen identifies gaps in primary care access. A positive screen triggers an internal referral to paediatric primary care. Patients are flagged before visits, and screening results are reviewed. Students place referrals for positive screens, finalised by providers. Follow-up occurs at 6 weeks. DATA COLLECTION: We assess screen positivity, referral uptake and completed appointments for all patients at 6 weeks.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningOrthopedicsPediatricsAdolescentBody Mass IndexChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalePediatric ObesityPrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementHealth BehaviorPaediatricsPrimary careQuality improvement methodologies

Identifiers

PMID40744651
PMCPMC12314974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.