SynthesisJournal of medical genetics2025
Congenital heart disease in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in Journal of medical genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Multicenter retrospective study on perceived effectiveness, reported side effects, and cognitive outcomes of SSRIs in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome, Oral-Maxillo-Facial Manifestations and Cognitive Functioning: Three Illustrative Case Reports.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multicenter retrospective study on effectiveness, reported side effects, and cognitive outcomes of SSRIs in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.Research square · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) results from a heterozygous deletion at chromosomal locus 22q11.2 and is associated with multisystem symptoms, including cardiovascular, psychiatric and palatal manifestations. Although congenital cardiovascular aberrations are frequent in patients with 22q11.DS, exact prevalence figures remain unclear. Literature was searched in August 2022 and updated in May 2024 using the databases PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane library to retrieve studies in English and German focusing only on studies involving 22q11.2DS. Prevalence data for cardiovascular aberrations were arcsine transformed and summarised by random-effects models using Meta-XL. Evidence quality was assessed via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The systematic searches identified 4338 studies, of which 7 were included for the meta-analysis of prevalence using random-effects models and sensitivity analyses. The pooled prevalence for heart defects (mean; 95% CI) was found to be elevated for tetralogy of Fallot (20%; 0.17 to 0.23), ventricular septal defect (14%; 0.12 to 0.16), pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect (9%; 0.06; 0.12), interrupted aortic arch (10%; 0.06 to 0.15), truncus arteriosus communis (9%; 0.07 to 0.12) and atrial septal defect (3%; 0.01 to 0.04). The risk of bias of the included studies was low to moderate. This study, to our knowledge, represents the first systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalences for congenital cardiovascular aberrations in individuals with 22q11.2DS. The high frequencies observed underline the need for cardiovascular screening in patients with 22q11.2DS and genetic screening for 22q11.2DS in congenital heart disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.