Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40744511›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Randomised controlled trial of standard outpatient cardiac rehabilitation versus personalised cardiac rehabilitation for secondary prevention for all in need (SPAN) after type 1 myocardial infarction.

Tom Gilbert, Julie Redfern, Derek P Chew, John Atherton, Graham Hillis, Stephen Nicholls, David Brieger, Jamie Rankin, Sam Lehman, Andrew Maiorana and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Tom GilbertUWA Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2570-3963
Julie RedfernBond University Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Robina, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8707-5563
Derek P ChewVictorian Heart Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
John AthertonSchool of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Graham HillisUWA Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2417-4673
Stephen NichollsMonash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
David BriegerDepartment of Cardiology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia.
Jamie RankinDepartment of Cardiology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
Sam LehmanCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Andrew MaioranaPhysical Activity and Well-Being Research Group, enAble Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0681-1707
Charley BudgeonCardiovascular Epidemiology Research Centre, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1910-5561
Anne CordingleyConsumer and Community Advisory Council, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Teagan RobinsonConsumer and Community Advisory Council, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Tom BriffaCardiovascular Epidemiology Research Centre, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia tom.briffa@uwa.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0012-6461

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCardiac rehabilitation after type 1 myocardial infarction (type 1 MI) is an effective but underutilised method of preventing new cardiac events. This study aims to determine whether a programme of personalised cardiac rehabilitation achieves better completion rates compared with a routine outpatient rehabilitation model post-type 1 MI. A secondary aim is to determine any differences in rates of major adverse cardiovascular events at 12 months. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Secondary prevention for all in need (SPAN) is a prospective multisite single-blind comparative effectiveness randomised trial of personalised versus standard outpatient rehabilitation. Five hundred and thirty-two patients with a recent type 1 MI diagnosis will be randomised to either a personalised model of rehabilitation which includes flexibility in the components of rehabilitation and the time and location of contacts, or the standard outpatient model. Exclusion criteria include conditions associated with higher clinical risk to the participant, which introduce confounding to the study or interfere with a participant's ability to comply.The primary study endpoint is the proportion of patients who complete the assigned rehabilitation model. Completion of rehabilitation is defined as participation in ≥80% of all scheduled sessions, in either treatment arm. Assuming a power of 90% and an overall type 1 error of 5%, we expect that 50% of those randomised to usual care will meet the primary endpoint compared with 65% of those on personalised rehabilitation. To detect this difference of 15%, we require a sample size of 478 participants (239 per arm). Accounting for a conservative attrition rate of 10%, the total sample size required is 532. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial received ethical approval from the Southern Adelaide Clinical Human Research Ethics Committee (ref. 2022/HRE00071) in September 2022, with an opt-out approach. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12622000316707.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareCardiac RehabilitationMyocardial InfarctionPrecision MedicineSecondary PreventionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicOutpatientsProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodCARDIOLOGYMyocardial infarctionREHABILITATION MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID40744511
PMCPMC12315027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.