ArticleNucleic acids research2025
G-quadruplexes as potential traps for superenhancer marker BRD4: ligand-sensitive binding and co-separation in vitro.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- G-Quadruplexes: Structural Diversity and Emerging Roles in Biomolecular Condensation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- G4-Ligand-Directed PROTACs Unveil DR1 as a Novel Ligand-Co-Binding G4-Protein and Reshape G4-Dependent Transcription.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
G-quadruplexes (G4s) are prevalent at promoters and superenhancers (SEs), exclude nucleosomes, and recruit transcription factors. This study sought to determine whether the nucleosome exclusion affects the recruitment of the SE marker BRD4, which typically binds to acetylated histones and facilitates SE-promoter contacts via the phase separation-dependent mechanism. Analyses of the available whole-genome data revealed that SEs with the highest G4 density were depleted of nucleosomes but not of BRD4. This led us to test the possibility of histone-independent BRD4 maintenance at G4-rich SEs. A typical SE G4 destabilized a nearby nucleosome in vitro and, unlike B-DNA, bound weakly to BRD4 bromodomains. Similar to an acetylated nucleosome, the G4 promoted phase separation in BRD4 solutions. This effect was not altered by the histone competitor JQ1. However, it was attenuated by two known G4 ligands, suggesting that they could disrupt SE-promoter communication in cells. Consistently, these ligands downregulated several genes regulated by G4-rich SE-contacting promoters more efficiently than they did SE-independent genes. Our findings underscore the significance of G4-rich SEs as transcriptional regulators and provide new insights into their organization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.