ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2025
CLEAR: A vision to support clinical evidence lifecycle with continuous learning.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A data-driven method for research trend analysis in a scientific discipline: Application to the journal of biomedical informatics.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2026Article
- A neural-symbolic AI agent system for biomedical concept mapping.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- From Network Governance to Real-World-Time Learning: A High-Reliability Operating Model for Rare Cancers.Cancers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human knowledge of diseases, treatments, and prevention techniques is constantly evolving. The generation of clinical evidence using randomized controlled trials on human subjects occurs notably slowly and inefficiently. The Learning Health System (LHS) has been proposed to facilitate the continuous improvement of individual and population health through a cycle of knowledge, practice, and data. However, the gap between the demand for high-quality evidence to support clinical decisions and the available evidence continues to enlarge. While the current LHS vision articulates the integration of Real-World Data (RWD), the rapid generation of RWD often outpaces the rate of effective evidence synthesis and implementation. Considering this, we propose a new framework that more effectively leverages RWD to support the entire clinical evidence lifecycle through a continuous learning mechanism. This framework, powered by modern data science and informatics, offers enhanced scalability and efficiency. In this vision, specifically, RWD is integrated into the clinical evidence lifecycle via four closed feedback loops: 1) guiding research prioritization and study design, 2) facilitating clinical guideline development, 3) assisting guideline evaluation, and 4) supporting shared decision-making. Our framework enables rapid responsiveness to emerging health data and evolving healthcare needs, timely development of clinical guidelines to optimize clinical recommendations, and sustained improvements in clinical practice and patient outcomes. This vision calls for informatics support for an efficient, scalable, and stakeholder-aware clinical evidence lifecycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.