Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40744316›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2025

CLEAR: A vision to support clinical evidence lifecycle with continuous learning.

Yilu Fang, Gongbo Zhang, Fangyi Chen, George Hripcsak, Yifan Peng, Patrick Ryan, Chunhua Weng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yilu FangDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York 10032, USA.
Gongbo ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York 10032, USA.
Fangyi ChenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York 10032, USA.
George HripcsakDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York 10032, USA.
Yifan PengWeill Cornell Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences, New York 10022, USA.
Patrick RyanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York 10032, USA; Observational Health Data Analytics, Janssen Research and Development, Titusville, NJ 08560, USA.
Chunhua WengDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York 10032, USA. Electronic address: cw2384@cumc.columbia.edu.

Funding

ClinEX - Clinical Evidence Extraction, Representation, and AppraisalR01LM014344 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Yong Chen, Yifan Peng · 2023 to 2026
$2.7M
Extraction and summarization of evidence-based medicineR01LM014573 · NLM · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Yifan Peng, CHUNHUA WENG · 2024 to 2026
$1.1M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM014344NLM NIH HHS R01 LM014573
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human knowledge of diseases, treatments, and prevention techniques is constantly evolving. The generation of clinical evidence using randomized controlled trials on human subjects occurs notably slowly and inefficiently. The Learning Health System (LHS) has been proposed to facilitate the continuous improvement of individual and population health through a cycle of knowledge, practice, and data. However, the gap between the demand for high-quality evidence to support clinical decisions and the available evidence continues to enlarge. While the current LHS vision articulates the integration of Real-World Data (RWD), the rapid generation of RWD often outpaces the rate of effective evidence synthesis and implementation. Considering this, we propose a new framework that more effectively leverages RWD to support the entire clinical evidence lifecycle through a continuous learning mechanism. This framework, powered by modern data science and informatics, offers enhanced scalability and efficiency. In this vision, specifically, RWD is integrated into the clinical evidence lifecycle via four closed feedback loops: 1) guiding research prioritization and study design, 2) facilitating clinical guideline development, 3) assisting guideline evaluation, and 4) supporting shared decision-making. Our framework enables rapid responsiveness to emerging health data and evolving healthcare needs, timely development of clinical guidelines to optimize clinical recommendations, and sustained improvements in clinical practice and patient outcomes. This vision calls for informatics support for an efficient, scalable, and stakeholder-aware clinical evidence lifecycle.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineLearning Health SystemMedical InformaticsHumansContinuous learningEvidence-based medicineEvidence-based researchReal-world data

Identifiers

PMID40744316
PMCPMC12339056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.