Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40744223›Full record

ReviewLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2025

Antibody-Based Multiplex Image Analysis: Standard Analytical Workflows and Artificial Intelligence Tools for Pathologists.

Mohamed Omar, Giuseppe Nicolo' Fanelli, Fabio Socciarelli, Varun Ullanat, Sreekar Reddy Puchala, James Wen, Alex Chowdhury, Itzel Valencia, Cristian Scatena, Luigi Marchionni and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Emerging technologies in the spatial proteomics landscape.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mohamed OmarDepartment of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Cancer Therapeutics Program, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Giuseppe Nicolo' FanelliDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Fabio SocciarelliDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Varun UllanatDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sreekar Reddy PuchalaDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
James WenDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Alex ChowdhuryDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Itzel ValenciaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Cristian ScatenaDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Luigi MarchionniDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Renato UmetonDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Electronic address: umeton@mit.edu.
Massimo LodaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Electronic address: mloda@med.cornell.edu.

Funding

Project 3: Analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic factors that promote prostate neuroendocrine differentiationP01CA265768 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Massimo Loda · 2022 to 2026
$13.4M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA265768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional histopathology has traditionally been the cornerstone of disease diagnosis, relying on qualitative or semiquantitative visual inspection of tissue sections to detect pathological changes. Singleplex immunohistochemistry (IHC), although effective in detecting specific biomarkers, is often limited by its single-marker focus, which constrains its ability to capture the complexity of the tissue environment. The introduction of multiplexed imaging technologies, such as multiplex IHC and multiplex immunofluorescence, has been transformative, enabling the simultaneous visualization of multiple biomarkers within a single tissue section. These approaches complement morphology with quantitative multimarker data and spatial context, providing a more comprehensive view of cellular interactions and disease mechanisms. However, the rich data from multiplex IHC/multiplex immunofluorescence experiments come with significant analytical challenges, as large multichannel images require comprehensive processing to transform raw imaging data into quantitative and meaningful information. This review focuses on the standard digital image analysis workflow for multiplex imaging in pathology, covering each step from image acquisition and preprocessing to cell segmentation and biomarker quantification. We discuss the common open-source tools that support each step to guide users in selecting appropriate solutions. By outlining an end-to-end pipeline with concrete examples, this review is intended for practicing pathologists and researchers with limited computational expertise. It provides practical guidance and best practices to help integrate multiplex image analysis into routine pathology workflows and translational research, bridging the gap between advanced imaging technology and day-to-day diagnostic practice.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImmunohistochemistryBiomarkersFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansPathologistsWorkflowBiomarkersartificial intelligencecomputational pathologydigital pathologymultiplexed imagingPathMLspatial omics

Identifiers

PMID40744223
PMCPMC13072558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.