ReviewLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2025
Antibody-Based Multiplex Image Analysis: Standard Analytical Workflows and Artificial Intelligence Tools for Pathologists.
Review in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging technologies in the spatial proteomics landscape.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Diagnostic practice and awareness of SDH- and FH-deficient renal cell carcinoma: results from an Italian Study Group of uropathology (GIUP) survey.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Review
- LazySlide: accessible and interoperable whole-slide image analysis.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Toward a regional digital pathology network in Tuscany: current status and implementation roadmap.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Spatial AI in cancer: mapping immune evasion topology through multi-modal omics and deep learning.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- TGF-β-driven T-cell exclusion in ovarian cancer: single-cell and spatial transcriptomic views of immune low-response states.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional histopathology has traditionally been the cornerstone of disease diagnosis, relying on qualitative or semiquantitative visual inspection of tissue sections to detect pathological changes. Singleplex immunohistochemistry (IHC), although effective in detecting specific biomarkers, is often limited by its single-marker focus, which constrains its ability to capture the complexity of the tissue environment. The introduction of multiplexed imaging technologies, such as multiplex IHC and multiplex immunofluorescence, has been transformative, enabling the simultaneous visualization of multiple biomarkers within a single tissue section. These approaches complement morphology with quantitative multimarker data and spatial context, providing a more comprehensive view of cellular interactions and disease mechanisms. However, the rich data from multiplex IHC/multiplex immunofluorescence experiments come with significant analytical challenges, as large multichannel images require comprehensive processing to transform raw imaging data into quantitative and meaningful information. This review focuses on the standard digital image analysis workflow for multiplex imaging in pathology, covering each step from image acquisition and preprocessing to cell segmentation and biomarker quantification. We discuss the common open-source tools that support each step to guide users in selecting appropriate solutions. By outlining an end-to-end pipeline with concrete examples, this review is intended for practicing pathologists and researchers with limited computational expertise. It provides practical guidance and best practices to help integrate multiplex image analysis into routine pathology workflows and translational research, bridging the gap between advanced imaging technology and day-to-day diagnostic practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.