ArticleInfant behavior & development2025
NIH Baby Toolbox® methodology and norms development.
Article in Infant behavior & development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging research in early cognitive development for application and impact.Frontiers in developmental psychology · 2026Article
- Bringing developmental assessment to the 21st century: The NIH Baby Toolbox.Infant behavior & development · 2025Article
- Development and validation of the NIH Baby Toolbox® language measures.Infant behavior & development · 2025Article
- Development and validation of the NIH Baby Toolbox Social-Emotional Functioning measures.Infant behavior & development · 2025Article
- Development and validation of the NIH Baby Toolbox® Math measures.Infant behavior & development · 2025Article
- Development and validation of the motor measures in the NIH Baby Toolbox®.Infant behavior & development · 2025Article
- Automated iPad-based gaze detection in the NIH Baby Toolbox® norming study.Infant behavior & development · 2025Article
- Composite scores for the NIH Baby Toolbox®.Infant behavior & development · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The NIH Baby Toolbox is a comprehensive battery of cognitive, motor, and social-emotional assessments designed for infants aged 1-42 months. Although many standardized, normed early developmental assessments exist, these measures are time-intensive, costly, and require trained experts to administer, score, and interpret. The Baby Toolbox is intended to serve as a "common currency" across developmental fields and provide an extension to the NIH Toolbox for Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function® (NIHTB), which is appropriate for individuals from 3 to 90 years of age. The Baby Toolbox was normed using a nationally representative sample of infants and toddlers aged 16 days to 48 months old from the US population (N = 2515; n = 2042 English, n = 473 Spanish). The sample was weighted to match the US Census based on the demographic targets used to create the norming plan. After data collection, the demographic targets were updated to reflect the current figures. Cases were individually weighted to ensure representativeness. Unweighted and weighted demographics are reported herein. Scores were regressed on age in months (for ages where the tests or composites were appropriate) using generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape to obtain expected reference values and standard deviations across age. The Baby Toolbox norming study has been designed to minimize bias and maximize representativeness and precision of estimates. The availability of a "toolbox" of tests built using modern measurement theory to address developmental concerns will be an important foundation for addressing critical research questions in infant neurological and behavioral health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.