ArticleInfant behavior & development2025
Development and validation of the motor measures in the NIH Baby Toolbox®.
Article in Infant behavior & development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bringing developmental assessment to the 21st century: The NIH Baby Toolbox.Infant behavior & development · 2025Article
- NIH Baby Toolbox® methodology and norms development.Infant behavior & development · 2025Article
- Development and validation of the NIH Baby Toolbox Social-Emotional Functioning measures.Infant behavior & development · 2025Article
- Development and validation of the NIH Baby Toolbox® Math measures.Infant behavior & development · 2025Article
- Composite scores for the NIH Baby Toolbox®.Infant behavior & development · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motor skill is foundational for early development and an important indicator of whether children's development is on track. The NIH "Baby" Toolbox®, an iPad-based app designed for broad use by nonexperts, includes measures to assess motor skill in children aged 16 days to 42 months. The measures use direct observation in functional, everyday, child-friendly tasks-reaching to eat and getting up to go to a caregiver-to assess children's manual, postural, and locomotor skills. Administration and scoring uniquely capitalize on the video capabilities of the iPad to allow instantaneous review of fast, subtle movements and comparison to standard exemplar illustrations. Moreover, videos can be exported for later analysis and reuse. A large-scale norming study (N = 2353; 1921 English-speaking, 432 Spanish-speaking) verified the reliability and validity of the Reach to Eat and Get Up and Go measures. An additional supplementary measure, Sit and Stand, is designed to assess stationary postural control, akin to the Standing Balance measure in the NIH Toolbox for older children and adults. Findings support the Baby Toolbox as a reliable, valid, scalable assessment instrument for infant and toddler fine and gross motor skill.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.