Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40743519›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2025

Practical Approaches to Patient-Centered Care in Europe: Mixed Methods Study Developing a Conceptual Framework for Comprehensive Cancer Care Networks.

Emily Hickmann, Peggy Richter, Hannes Schlieter, Maja Cemazar, Dorota Dudek-Godeau, Nele Grapentin, Ellen Griesshammer, Marjetka Jelenc, Sigita Liutkauskiene, Alain Ravaud and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Emily HickmannTechnische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Business and Economics, Research Group Digital Health, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5300-9661
Peggy RichterTechnische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Business and Economics, Research Group Digital Health, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6019-7840
Hannes SchlieterTechnische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Business and Economics, Research Group Digital Health, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6513-9017
Maja CemazarInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-1418-1928
Dorota Dudek-GodeauNational Institute of Public Health National Institute of Hygiene National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3815-246X
Nele GrapentinGerman Cancer Society, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-0701-5044
Ellen GriesshammerGerman Cancer Society, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2022-4530
Marjetka JelencNational Institute of Public Health, Research Group Raziskovalna skupina NIJZ, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-0515-1970
Sigita LiutkauskieneConservative Oncology Department of Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno klinikos, Oncology Institute of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Oncology and Hematology Department, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-4142-3136
Alain RavaudBordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9455-6744
Xavier TroussardUniversity and Hospital Center Caen Normandie, Caen Cedex, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6863-9992
Simone WesselmannDeutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8937-9384

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn contemporary health care, patient-centered care has emerged as a pivotal paradigm shift that redefines the traditional physician-centric model. Particularly in the context of cancer care, marked by its intricate nature and emotional impact, there is a pressing requirement to rethink how health care is delivered. In this context, comprehensive cancer care networks (CCCNs) provide a new means of structuring and delivering quality cancer care, recognizing each patient's unique preferences and needs.

objectiveThis study aimed to establish a consistent definition and framework for patient centeredness in CCCNs, facilitating the integration of a patient-centered approach to enhance care quality.

methodsWe conducted an umbrella review focusing on generic and oncology-specific dimensions of patient centeredness to establish the definition and framework. The data were analyzed and synthesized using an inductive category development approach, which guided the derivation of dimensions for the framework. The review was complemented by a survey of 23 key stakeholders within CCCNs and a focus group with patient representatives. This process involved iterative group discussions to achieve consensus on the framework and definition.

resultsThe study presents a robust definition and framework of patient centeredness tailored to CCCNs, validated by an initial agreement rate of 96% among survey respondents. Patient centeredness in a CCCN is defined as a philosophy of care prioritizing the physical, emotional, and social needs and personal values of patients with cancer at every step of the patient pathway. In patient-centered CCCNs, patients are empowered and engaged in becoming active partners in health care in relation to their individual preferences and capabilities, with the goal of providing personalized, high-quality, holistic care with the best possible outcomes. The framework comprises 8 primary dimensions: empowering patients, engaging and involving patients, treating the patient as a unique person, enhancing the therapeutic relationship, enhancing a patient-centered culture, providing holistic care, recognizing and supporting the health care professional as a person, and coordinating care. Each dimension is supported by specific subdimensions and actionable patient-centered activities that facilitate practical implementation.

conclusionsThe results provide a comprehensive perspective on the complex elements that compose patient-centered care within CCCNs in Europe. This contributes to a better understanding and application of patient centeredness in cancer care and possibly other contexts. The results presented in this paper promise to support cancer care networks and other health care contexts in creating a patient-centered environment where patients feel genuinely heard, valued, and actively engaged in their care decisions.

Indexed as

Comprehensive Health CareNeoplasmsPatient-Centered CareDelivery of Health CareEuropeHumanscomprehensive cancer care networksoncologypatient centerednesspatient empowermentpatient engagement

Identifiers

PMID40743519
PMCPMC12355145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.