Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40743517›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2025

Capturing Community Perspectives in a Statewide Cancer Needs Assessment: Online Focus Group Study.

Jessica R Thompson, Keeghan Francis, Caree R McAfee, Madeline Brown, Todd Burus, Melinda Rogers, Connie L Sorrell, Elizabeth Westbrook, Lovoria B Williams, Jennifer Redmond Knight and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jessica R ThompsonDepartment of Health Policy and Administration, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6954-2663
Keeghan FrancisCommunity Impact Office, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-9672-3413
Caree R McAfeeCommunity Impact Office, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2068-3120
Madeline BrownCommunity Impact Office, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6546-9676
Todd BurusCommunity Impact Office, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6819-1788
Melinda RogersKentucky Cancer Program-East, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, United States.ORCID 0009-0001-9421-2316
Connie L SorrellKentucky Cancer Program-West, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-2176-734X
Elizabeth WestbrookKentucky Cancer Program-West, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States.ORCID 0009-0001-3546-2681
Lovoria B WilliamsCollege of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2513-9167
Jennifer Redmond KnightDepartment of Health Management and Policy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4891-7163
Elaine RussellKentucky Cancer Consortium, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, United States.ORCID 0009-0007-3899-7968
Natalie P WilhiteCommunity Impact Office, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9048-6328
Pamela C HullCommunity Impact Office, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4412-9087

Funding

University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Support Grant ECIA SupplementP30CA177558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Jennifer F Rogers · 2013 to 2026
$38.3M
Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001998 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HARTMANN, KATHERINE E, KERN, PHILIP A · 2016 to 2025
$34.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001998NCI NIH HHS P30 CA177558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKentucky has the highest all-site cancer incidence and mortality rates in the United States. Conducting needs assessments in a large geographic area, such as an entire state, poses challenges in collecting qualitative data from diverse rural and urban contexts. In 2021, a steering committee was formed to drive a multimethod, statewide cancer needs assessment (CNA) to identify the future priorities for all cancer-related care in Kentucky.

objectiveWe aimed to report on the online focus group component of the CNA by documenting existing community resources and perceived needs across the cancer care continuum. In addition, we aimed to explore the impacts of social determinants of health among populations experiencing health disparities.

methodsThrough existing partnerships and a national research registry, we recruited adult Kentucky residents who were not employed in health occupations to participate in 11 online 60-minute focus groups, stratified to include multiple target populations and geographic areas. We based our semistructured discussion guide on the cancer care continuum and focused on social determinants of health, health equity, and factors affecting cancer diagnoses and outcomes. We conducted a qualitative line-by-line analysis of the recorded transcripts to identify themes.

resultsThe participants (N=51; mean 4.63, SD 2.26 per group) lived in 25 different counties, including 35% (18/51) from rural communities, 14% (7/51) from the Appalachian area of Kentucky, and 31% (16/51) who self-identified with a racial or ethnic minority group. We identified 17 primary themes representing community-perceived needs and potential solutions across the cancer care continuum, including novel approaches to make information accessible; messaging not interpreted as blaming or shaming; messaging from individuals who engender trust; screening efforts to reach individuals where they are; ways to address practical barriers to screening and treatment, such as cost and transportation; and ways to increase knowledge about insurance coverage. In addition, we found 83 emergent subthemes specific to race, ethnicity, rural and urban residence, sexual orientation and gender identity, and age. The participants described the need to promote positive, culturally sensitive patient-health care provider communication and to create safe care spaces that consider the ways in which social norms affect cancer care, fight stigma, and improve health equity.

conclusionsBy conducting statewide qualitative data collection online, we provided valuable depth of understanding for future programs and research to address cancer incidence and mortality in Kentucky. The findings pointed to several potential actions to address community-perceived needs across the cancer care continuum, including increasing accessible risk reduction information, expanding ways to overcome challenges to screening and treatment, building patient navigation resources, and increasing positive patient-health care provider communication. The findings also suggest that online focus groups can be a valuable component of CNAs to capture cancer-related needs and solutions across large geographic areas and diverse populations.

Indexed as

Needs AssessmentNeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleFocus GroupsHumansKentuckyMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSocial Determinants of Healthcancerfocus groupshealth equityneeds assessmentqualitative researchvirtual data collection

Identifiers

PMID40743517
PMCPMC12355136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.