Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40743311›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Surgical workspace in porcine thoracoscopy with two-lung ventilation.

Willem van Weteringen, Jan-Wiebe H Korstanje, Lonneke M Staals, Patricia A C Specht, Egbert G Mik, René M H Wijnen, John Vlot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Willem van WeteringenDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2667-3169
Jan-Wiebe H KorstanjeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4171-1509
Lonneke M StaalsDepartment of Pediatric Anesthesiology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7867-971X
Patricia A C SpechtLaboratory of Experimental Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Egbert G MikLaboratory of Experimental Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
René M H WijnenDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
John VlotDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In neonatal and pediatric thoracoscopy, two-lung ventilation is often used due to the size constraints of double-lumen tubes or selective bronchial blockers. Reducing the volume of both lungs to create surgical workspace requires moderation in the application of capnothorax insufflation pressures, and requires experienced anesthesiologists to manage ventilation. This balance was investigated in anesthetized pigs in the left decubitus position with a capnothorax, using volume-guaranteed intermittent positive pressure ventilation. End-expiratory computed tomography scans were obtained in 10 pigs (median weight 21.5 kg, range 17.8 to 26.3 kg) during incremental CO2 insufflation pressures of 0, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 10 mmHg. Capnothorax, right lung and left lung volumes were measured. At an insufflation pressure of 10 mmHg, peak ventilation pressures had a median of 35 cmH2O. Insufflation pressures ≥ 6 mmHg had profound cardiorespiratory effects, requiring inotropic support. Capnothorax volume reached a median of 1503 (IQR 1465-1596) ml at 10 mmHg, at which diaphragmatic displacement contributed 79.5% to capnothorax volume, with smaller contributions from lung volume (16.1%) and thoracic expansion (4.4%). Thoracoscopic workspace during two-lung ventilation originates mainly from diaphragmatic displacement. In a porcine model the marked cardiorespiratory consequences of insufflation emphasized the need to minimize insufflation pressures.

Indexed as

LungRespiration, ArtificialThoracoscopyAnimalsInsufflationSwineTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID40743311
PMCPMC12312924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.