Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40743282›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A bearing fault diagnosis method based on hybrid artificial intelligence models.

Lijie Sun, Xin Tao, Yanping Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lijie SunSchool of Art and Design, Taizhou University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3561-3427
Xin TaoSchool of Electronics and Information Engineering, Taizhou University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yanping LuSchool of Information, Liaoning University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The working state of rolling bearing severely affects the performance of industrial equipment. Addressing the issue of that the difficulty of incipient weak signals feature extraction influences the rolling bearing diagnosis accuracy, an efficient bearing fault diagnostic technique, a proposition is forwarded for hybrid artificial intelligence models, which integrates Improved Harris Hawks Optimization (IHHO) into the optimization of Deep Belief Networks and Extreme Learning Machines (DBN-ELM). The process employs Maximum Second-order Cyclostationary Blind Deconvolution (CYCBD) to filter out noise from the vibration signals emitted by bearings; secondly, considering the issue with the conventional Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO) algorithm which tends to prematurely converge to local optima, the differential evolution mutation operator is introduced and the escape energy factor is improved from linear to nonlinear in IHHO; then, a double-layer network model based on DBN-ELM is proposed, to avoid the number of hidden layer nodes of DBN from human experience interference, and IHHO is used to optimize DBN structure, which is denoted as IHHO-DBN-ELM method; with the optimal structure is obtained by using a combined IHHO optimized DBN and ELM; in conclusion, the proposed IHHO-DBN-ELM approach is applied to the bearing fault detection using the Western Reserve University's bearing fault dataset. The outcome of the experiments demonstrates that IHHO-DBN-ELM technique successfully extracts fault characteristics from the raw time-domain signals, thereby offering enhanced diagnostic accuracy and superior generalization capabilities.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansModels, TheoreticalNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID40743282
PMCPMC12312945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.