ArticlePloS one2025
Prenatal developmental toxicity of Urtica simensis essential oil in rat embryos and rat fetuses.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pregnant women inhaled fresh U. simensis steam vapor to fumigate their bodies, and boiled it for tea. However, the safety of this practice during pregnancy has not yet been reported. This study aimed to evaluate the prenatal developmental toxicity of U.simensis essential oil in rat embryos and fetuses. The essential oil was extracted through hydrodistillation from aerial parts of U.simensis. One hundred pregnant rats were randomly assigned to five groups (20 rats per group). Groups I to III were administered oral doses of 250, 500, and 1000 mg/kg of U.simensis essential oil. Groups IV and V were used as pair-fed and ad libitum controls, respectively. The developing embryos and fetuses were retrieved on 12 and 20 days of gestation, respectively. Embryos were evaluated for growth and developmental delays. Fetuses were evaluated for external, skeletal, and visceral abnormalities. Oral doses of 250 and 500 mg/kg of U.simensis essential oil had no observed adverse effects in both rat embryos and rat fetuses. However, somite numbers and morphological scores were significantly decreased in gravid rats treated with 1000 mg/kg of essential oil. Embryonic developments of the caudal neural tube and forebrain were significantly delayed in pregnant dams administered 1000 mg/kg of essential oil. Crown-rump length and fetal weight were significantly decreased in gravid rats given 1000 mg/kg of essential oil. Gravid rats received 1000 mg/kg of essential oil also revealed a significant increase in fetal resorption. In conclusion, high-dose oral administration of U.simensis essential oil revealed detrimental effects in both rat embryos and fetuses. Therefore, pregnant women should be informed the potential risks associated with the nutraceutical use of U.simensis during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.