ArticlePloS one2025
Exploration of short-term predictions and long-term projections of Barents Sea cod biomass using statistical methods on data from dynamical models.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to explore how well simple statistical modeling can generate short-term predictions and long-term projections of the total biomass of the Northeast Arctic stock of Atlantic cod (Gadus Morhua) inhabiting the Barents Sea. We examine the predictability of statistical models only based on hydrographic and lower trophic level biological variables from dynamical modeling. Simple and multiple linear regression models are developed based on gridded variables from the regional ocean model NEMO-NAA10km and the ecosystem model NORWECOM.E2E. This includes the essential environmental variables temperature, salinity, sea ice concentration, primary production and secondary production. The regression models are statistically evaluated to find variables that can capture variability in Barents Sea cod biomass. Finally, future total cod stock biomass is projected by applying the best found regression models to the range of downscaled IPCC climate scenarios from the coupled Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6 Shared Socioeconomic Pathways; SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, SSP5-8.5). Our prediction models are based on variables that affect cod both directly and indirectly. We find that several regression models have high prediction skill and capture the variations in total stock biomass of the Northeast Arctic cod well. Our results suggest that increased ocean temperature and abundant zooplankton may lead to a large cod stock. However, even if total stock biomass has a positive trend with an increase in copepods in the highest warming scenario SSP5-8.5, we found that it has a negative trend in the low emission scenario SSP1-2.6 when the regional ocean and ecosystem models show weak cooling and reduced zooplankton. We show that variability in essential environmental variables can provide a remarkably good first approximation to cod dynamics. However, to resolve the full picture other factors like fishing and natural mortality also need to be addressed explicitly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.