ArticlePloS one2025
Apparent differences between human and chimp proteomes are reduced when considering human population: Human specific variants are enriched in disordered and compositionally biased regions.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fascination with RNA Editing: In the Lights of Evolution and Biology.Journal of molecular evolution · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humans exhibit significant differences from other primates in anatomy, physiology, behavior, and culture, despite having similar genomes. Understanding the genetic basis of these unique human traits has long been a goal of science and philosophy. Previous studies, including the comparison of the reference genomes, showed a high degree of sequence identity between the proteomes of humans and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), suggesting that differences may lie in gene regulation rather than protein function. To pinpoint human-specific protein mutations with possible relevance for human-specific traits, we went further in the study of human-chimp proteome differences by taking into account human genetic variation data from the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) at protein-coding genes. We additionally included 11 primate genomes to identify human-specific amino acids. Results showed that human-specific positions were dramatically reduced when considering population diversity. Our analysis identified 6210 human-specific amino acid substitutions across 4475 proteins. Interestingly, these residues are enriched on disordered and compositionally biased regions, suggesting a role in protein regulation instead of a catalytic or structural one. Accordingly, the set of proteins holding them was significantly enriched in proteins with disordered regions and with protein binding functions. We found that a subset of these residues is not only different in humans but also conserved across non-human primates, further supporting their potential importance in making us different from other primates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.