ArticlePloS one2025
Exploring the potential of synthetic and biological fungicides for managing the fungus-farming ambrosia beetle Xylosandrus compactus.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Editorial: Diversity of beetles and associated microorganisms, volume II.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- The Microbiome as a Protagonist of Xylophagous Insects in Adaptation to Environmental Conditions and Climate Change.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Little is known about effective control strategies targeting the invasive ambrosia beetle Xylosandrus compactus. This fungus-farming beetle is highly dependent on its primary nutritional fungal mutualist Ambrosiella xylebori. Traditionally, insect pest control programs target the pest directly. Here, we tested the potential of synthetic and microbial based fungicides to suppress the fungal mutualist, consequently hampering the beetle development. Thiophanate-methyl application to bay laurel (Laurus nobilis L.) stem sections proved to be effective in reducing the mutualist fungus occurrence in infested galleries, as well as to reduce the mean X. compactus brood size. Thiophanate-methyl and azoxystrobin significantly reduced the mean beetle brood size in extended laboratory conditions. Similarly, these two fungicides were the most effective in reducing the fungal lesion length, both when tested by soil or spray applications. Overall, thiophanate-methyl showed the highest reduction of the X. compactus brood size by spray application. No or low impact on X. compactus infestations was observed when testing the triazole mefentrifuconazole. Among tested microbial based fungicides, Trichoderma asperellum T34 was the only one causing a reduction of the fungal lesion length. To the best of our knowledge, this study provides, for the first time, baseline data on the potential of fungicides for disrupting the mutualistic interaction between X. compactus and its primary mutualist A. xylebori. These findings will help in developing novel and effective integrated pest management approaches based on the mycobiome alteration and targeting X. compactus in its invaded range.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.