ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition2026
Narrative coherence warps the timeline of recalled naturalistic events.
Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Narrative coherence warps the timeline of recalled naturalistic events.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2026Article
- Aging shifts recall of naturalistic events from temporal to topic organization.Psychology and aging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Memories of experiences are often tied together, where remembering one experience can spark memories of others. One may link temporally distant events based on their meaning or recall closely occurring events together. Linking based on temporal organization has been studied in simple list-learning paradigms, but less is known about how these effects manifest in real-life experiences. Here, we investigate how meaningful connections in a narrative interact with temporal context to influence recall. Participants encoded picture stories featuring multiple subplots, some of which connected across time (coherent narratives), while others did not (unrelated narratives). Replicating prior findings, coherent narratives were better recalled than unrelated narratives, regardless of temporal distance between events using character-cued (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.