ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
Hybrid protein-ligand binding residue prediction with protein language models: does the structure matter?
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Advantages of AI for Computational Protein Studies and Looking Ahead at the Next Challenges: Single Structures Are Not Enough.Journal of molecular biology · 2026Review
- NRB-FusePS: A Protein Language Model-Based Multimodal Framework for Predicting Ligand-Binding Residues in Nuclear Receptors.The protein journal · 2026Article
- Explainable AI reveals the allosteric blind spot in protein-ligand binding predictions.Cell reports. Physical science · 2026Article
- Decoding the allosteric grammar of protein kinases: A dual-stream framework integrating protein language models and energy landscape frustration analysis.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- Multivalent ion binding site identification with structure-based deep learning.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Integrated Framework for Probing Multimodal Protein Foundation Models with Structure-Functional Interpretability Analysis in Detection of Allosteric Binding Sites.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Targeting frizzled receptors (FZDs) for anti-tumor therapy: From orthosteric to allosteric inhibition.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Predicting and Decoding Allosteric Binding Sites Using Protein Language Models and Structure-Based Machine Learning: An Energy Landscape-Guided Explainable AI Framework.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Evaluating data partitioning strategies for accurate prediction of protein-ligand binding free energy changes in mutated proteins.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Machine learning approaches for predicting protein-ligand binding sites from sequence data.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Drug-Online: an online platform for drug-target interaction, affinity, and binding sites identification using deep learning.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationPredicting protein-ligand binding sites is crucial in studying protein interactions with applications in biotechnology and drug discovery. Two distinct paradigms have emerged for this purpose: sequence-based methods, which leverage protein sequence information, and structure-based methods, which rely on the three-dimensional (3D) structure of the protein. Here, we analyze a hybrid approach that combines the strengths of both paradigms by integrating two recent deep learning architectures: protein language models (pLMs) from the sequence-based paradigm and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) from the structure-based paradigm. Specifically, we construct a residue-level Graph Attention Network (GAT) model based on the protein's 3D structure that uses pre-trained pLM embeddings as node features. This integration enables us to study the interplay between the sequential information encoded in the protein sequence and the spatial relationships within the protein structure on the model performance.
resultsBy exploiting a benchmark dataset over a range of ligands and ligand types, we have shown that using the structure information consistently enhances the predictive power of the baselines in absolute terms. Nevertheless, as more complex pLMs are used to represent node features, the relative impact of the structure information represented by the GNN architecture diminishes. The above observations suggest that although the use of the experimental protein structure almost always improves the accuracy of the prediction of the binding site, complex pLMs still contain structural information that leads to good predictive performance even without the use of 3D structure. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study, as well as pretrained models, are available in the following Zenodo link https://zenodo.org/records/15184302. The source code that was used to generate the results of the current study is available in the following GitHub repository https://github.com/hamzagamouh/pt-lm-gnn as well as in the following Zenodo link https://zenodo.org/records/15192327.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.