Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40742753›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of language & communication disorders

Supporting Communication Access of People With Communication Disabilities and Communication Differences in UNCRPD-Ratified Countries: An Integrative Review.

Áine Kearns, Caroline Jagoe, Rachael Stockdale, Dorothy Clarke, Molly Manning, Ruth Mc Menamin, Yvonne Fitzmaurice, James Green, Orla Duffy, Helen Kelly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Áine KearnsSchool of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6596-2740
Caroline JagoeSchool of Linguistic, Speech & Communication Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3015-1550
Rachael StockdaleSchool of Clinical Therapies, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4228-1993
Dorothy ClarkeSchool of Health Sciences, Ulster University, Derry∼Londonderry, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5104-8800
Molly ManningSchool of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2798-2695
Ruth Mc MenaminSchool of Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9485-3148
Yvonne FitzmauriceSchool of Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6820-2800
James GreenSchool of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7309-0751
Orla DuffySchool of Health Sciences, Ulster University, Derry∼Londonderry, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3729-7576
Helen KellySchool of Clinical Therapies, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3694-2086

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) recognizes communication accessibility as a fundamental human right. Communication plays a key role in facilitating belonging, sharing and engaging with communities, allowing individuals to connect and forge relationships. Communication is fundamental to well-being and building a sense of self and identity, as well as establishing and maintaining social roles and vocation. Those with communication disabilities or differences can face many barriers to social participation, inclusion and potential financial implications.

aimsThis integrative review explores policy, practices and guidelines that support communication access of adults with communication disabilities and differences in selected English-speaking countries with UNCRPD-ratified status and well-established speech and language therapy services.

methodsAn integrative review of the literature was undertaken. A systematic search of the published, peer-reviewed literature was conducted for empirical research, and a manual search was undertaken to obtain policy, practice, or guidelines, to support communication access at a sectoral/service or community level. A multi-scalar approach situates the findings within several contexts: international law, national legislation and policy, professional guidelines and evidence from local/national projects. MAIN CONTRIBUTIONS: A multi-scalar map was developed that positions the findings on communication access within the included countries (Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand), across local/national programmes and projects (n = 11), professional body and civil society guidance, regional/national legislation and policy specific to communication access and finally the international normative instrument of the UNCRPD. The findings indicate that communication accessibility is recognised as a fundamental human right, but signatory states are required to take appropriate measures to ensure access to information and communication for persons with disabilities. National legislation, policy and practice need further scrutiny in this regard.

conclusionsThis review examines the complex phenomenon of communication access for people with communication disabilities and differences. The findings of this review can inform and shape practice with regard to communication accessibility as well as support advocacy efforts and future research in this area. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject Communication accessibility is a fundamental human right. It can be characterized by the respectful and responsive treatment of individuals with communication disabilities and differences, along with the implementation of strategies and resources and the adaptation of environments, process and systems to facilitate effective communication. What this paper adds to existing knowledge A multi-scalar map was developed that situates the findings on communication access within the included countries (Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand), across local/national programmes and projects (n = 11), professional body and civil society guidance, regional/national legislation and policies specific to communication access, and finally the international normative instrument of the UNCRPD. There is a lack of a shared understanding of communication access within empirical research, policy and local and national guidelines across the included countries. In addition, the focus on the right to communication is addressed more explicitly in some groups (and country contexts) than others. What are the practical and clinical implications of this work? This review highlights how multimodal communication is important for accessible communication. Co-design can also be harnessed to enhance communication access. The review provides an integrated set of data (empirical research, policy and guidelines) that can be used in future research, practice development and advocacy.

Indexed as

Communication BarriersCommunication DisordersHealth Services AccessibilityHuman RightsPersons with DisabilitiesHumansUnited Nationsaccessibilitycommunication accessintegrative reviewmulti‐scalar mapUNCRPD

Identifiers

PMID40742753
PMCPMC12312783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.