Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40742747›Full record

ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2025

3DMPR - a robust morphological approach for applying phase retrieval in proximity to highly attenuating objects in computed tomography.

James A Pollock, L C P Croton, K S Morgan, K J Crossley, M J Wallace, G A Buckley, S B Hooper, M J Kitchen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

James A PollockSchool of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
L C P CrotonSchool of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9174-5267
K S MorganSchool of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
K J CrossleyRitchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1580-1156
M J WallaceRitchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5785-5120
G A BuckleyWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2763-492X
S B HooperRitchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1676-4825
M J KitchenSchool of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0029-6660

Funding

Australian Research Council FT18010037National Health and Medical Research Council 2012257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-ray imaging is a fast, precise and non-invasive method of imaging which, when combined with computed tomography, provides detailed 3D rendering of samples. Incorporating propagation-based phase contrast can vastly improve data quality for weakly attenuating samples via phase retrieval, allowing radiation exposure to be reduced. However, applying phase retrieval to multi-material samples commonly requires the choice of which material boundary to tune the reconstruction. Selecting the boundary with strongest phase contrast increases noise suppression, but at the detriment of over-blurring other interfaces and potentially removing quantitative sample information. Additionally, conventional phase retrieval algorithms cannot be used for regions bounded by more than one material, requiring alternative methods. Here we present a computationally efficient, non-iterative nor AI-mediated method for applying strong phase retrieval, whilst preserving sharp boundaries for all materials within the sample. 3D phase retrieval is combined with morphological operations to prevent over-blurring artefacts from being introduced, while avoiding the potentially long convergence times required by iterative approaches. This technique, entitled 3DMPR, was tested on phase contrast images of a rabbit kitten brain encased by the surrounding dense skull. Using 24 keV synchrotron radiation with a 5 m propagation distance, 3DMPR provided a 6.8-fold improvement in the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of brain tissue over the standard phase retrieval procedure, without over-smoothing the images. Simultaneous quantification of edge resolution and SNR gain was performed with an aluminium-water phantom imaged using a microfocus X-ray tube at 35 kV

Indexed as

computed tomographyhigh contrastimage processingimage segmentationmulti-material samplesphase contrastphase retrievalsynchrotron imagingX-ray imaging

Identifiers

PMID40742747
PMCPMC12416424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.