ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2025
3DMPR - a robust morphological approach for applying phase retrieval in proximity to highly attenuating objects in computed tomography.
Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
X-ray imaging is a fast, precise and non-invasive method of imaging which, when combined with computed tomography, provides detailed 3D rendering of samples. Incorporating propagation-based phase contrast can vastly improve data quality for weakly attenuating samples via phase retrieval, allowing radiation exposure to be reduced. However, applying phase retrieval to multi-material samples commonly requires the choice of which material boundary to tune the reconstruction. Selecting the boundary with strongest phase contrast increases noise suppression, but at the detriment of over-blurring other interfaces and potentially removing quantitative sample information. Additionally, conventional phase retrieval algorithms cannot be used for regions bounded by more than one material, requiring alternative methods. Here we present a computationally efficient, non-iterative nor AI-mediated method for applying strong phase retrieval, whilst preserving sharp boundaries for all materials within the sample. 3D phase retrieval is combined with morphological operations to prevent over-blurring artefacts from being introduced, while avoiding the potentially long convergence times required by iterative approaches. This technique, entitled 3DMPR, was tested on phase contrast images of a rabbit kitten brain encased by the surrounding dense skull. Using 24 keV synchrotron radiation with a 5 m propagation distance, 3DMPR provided a 6.8-fold improvement in the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of brain tissue over the standard phase retrieval procedure, without over-smoothing the images. Simultaneous quantification of edge resolution and SNR gain was performed with an aluminium-water phantom imaged using a microfocus X-ray tube at 35 kV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.