ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2025
Brief Report-Written Personal Narratives of Autistic and Non-autistic Women: A Linguistic Analysis.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeNarrative research in autism has consistently revealed linguistic differences between autistic and non-autistic individuals. However, existing studies predominantly focus on male samples, overlooking the communicative profiles of autistic women. Recent studies suggest that autistic women exhibit distinct socio-communicative characteristics compared to both autistic men and non-autistic women. Given the important role of written communication in academic and professional settings and the reported preference for written expression among autistic adults, this study investigates the linguistic features of written narratives produced by autistic and non-autistic women.
methodsFifteen autistic and fifteen non-autistic women each wrote four episodic memories based on emotion cue words (pride, sadness, happiness, anger). These narratives were systematically analyzed across three linguistic dimensions: microstructure (narrative length, lexical variability, use of unique and low-frequency words), macrostructure (use of causal connectives) and internal state language (emotion, cognition, perception, modality and evaluation words).
resultsAutistic women produced significantly longer narratives with higher lexical variability, more unique and low-frequency words than non-autistic women, particularly in narratives involving negative emotions. They also used fewer explicit causal connectives and showed a reduced use of cognition words but included more perception words compared to non-autistic women. No group differences were observed for emotion, modality and evaluation words.
conclusionThis exploratory study contributes to a better characterization of the linguistic profile of autistic women in a written task. The results suggest a unique writing profile, highlighting strengths in lexical variability and vocabulary, and challenges in the expression of explicit causal relations and internal state language.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40742674What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.