ReviewJapanese journal of radiology2025
Navigating the AI revolution: will radiology sink or soar?
Review in Japanese journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- When Cancer Clots: An Extensive Radiologic Analysis of Cancer-Associated Thromboembolism.Cancers · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Hidden Fragilities and the Path to Resilience.Saudi medical journal · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Medical Education (2013-2024): A Scopus-Based Bibliometric Analysis.The East African health research journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid acceleration of digital transformation and artificial intelligence (AI) is fundamentally reshaping medicine. Much like previous technological revolutions, AI-driven by advances in computer technology and software including machine learning, computer vision, and generative models-is redefining cognitive work in healthcare. Radiology, as one of the first fully digitized medical specialties, is at the forefront of this transformation. AI is automating workflows, enhancing image acquisition and interpretation, and improving diagnostic precision, which collectively boost efficiency, reduce costs, and elevate patient care. Global data networks and AI-powered platforms are enabling borderless collaboration, empowering radiologists to focus on complex decision-making and patient interaction. Despite these profound opportunities, widespread AI adoption in radiology remains limited, often confined to specific use cases, such as chest, neuro, and musculoskeletal imaging. Concerns persist regarding transparency, explainability, and the ethical use of AI systems, while unresolved questions about workload, liability, and reimbursement present additional hurdles. Psychological and cultural barriers, including fears of job displacement and diminished professional autonomy, also slow acceptance. However, history shows that disruptive innovations often encounter initial resistance. Just as the discovery of X-rays over a century ago ushered in a new era, today, digitalization and artificial intelligence will drive another paradigm shift-this time through cognitive automation. To realize AI's full potential, radiologists must maintain clinical oversight and safeguard their professional identity, viewing AI as a supportive tool rather than a threat. Embracing AI will allow radiologists to elevate their profession, enhance interdisciplinary collaboration, and help shape the future of medicine. Achieving this vision requires not only technological readiness but also early integration of AI education into medical training. Ultimately, radiology will not be replaced by AI, but by radiologists who effectively harness its capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.