Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40742588›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

AI-Driven Injury Reporting in Pediatric Emergency Departments.

Devin Singh, Alper Celik, Evangeline W J Zhang, Eric Liu, Daniel Rosenfield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Devin SinghDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alper CelikCenter for Computational Medicine, SickKids, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Evangeline W J ZhangDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Eric LiuSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, Canada.
Daniel RosenfieldDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Injury is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among children worldwide. Prevention strategies rely on timely and accurate injury surveillance. Many national programs, including the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program (CHIRPP), depend on manual review of emergency department (ED) medical records to track injury trends. Rising ED volumes have strained manual processes, delaying data analysis and compromising early detection of public health risks. Objective: To evaluate whether natural language processing (NLP) transformer models can automate injury case detection in ED medical records, improving CHIRPP workflow efficiency while maintaining high sensitivity. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prognostic study of ED visits from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2023, at The Hospital for Sick Children, a high-volume tertiary pediatric referral center in Toronto, Canada, and a core CHIRPP site. The dataset included pediatric ED visits across all age groups. All medical records were labeled as requiring or not requiring CHIRPP reporting, with no exclusions. Two transformer-based NLP models, DistilBERT-base-uncased (model 1) and BERT-large-uncased (model 2), were fine tuned using supervised learning to classify medical records as CHIRPP-reportable or not. Exposure: Application of fine-tuned NLP transformer models to routine ED visit data to automate classification of injury-related cases for surveillance reporting. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included true positive rate (TPR), true negative rate (TNR), false positive rate (FPR), false negative rate (FNR), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Additional outcomes included the proportion of medical records requiring manual review to achieve 90% sensitivity. Results: Among 217 173 pediatric ED visits across all age groups, model 1 achieved an AUROC of 0.983, AUPRC of 0.932, TPR of 0.90, TNR of 0.99, FPR of 0.014, and FNR of 0.10. Model 2 showed similar performance with an AUROC of 0.983, AUPRC of 0.931, TPR of 0.90, TNR of 0.99, FPR of 0.012, and FNR of 0.09. Both models identified 90% of injury cases while reducing manual medical record review from 100% to 17% of ED visits. Conclusions and Relevance: NLP transformer models accurately automated detecting injury cases in ED patient medical records, with the potential of enabling real-time injury surveillance monitoring.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEmergency Service, HospitalNatural Language ProcessingWounds and InjuriesAdolescentCanadaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMale

Identifiers

PMID40742588
PMCPMC12314733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.