ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
The natural growth and rupture risk of intracranial aneurysms located in different segments of internal carotid artery: a multicenter cohort study.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aneurysm location is strongly related to the risk of aneurysm growth and rupture. Due to the unique anatomic features of internal carotid artery (ICA), unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) located in different segments of ICA may exhibit distinct instability risks. However, the natural instability risk of UIAs across ICA segments has not been extensively studied. This study included patients with ICA UIAs from two prospective, multicenter Chinese cohorts. All patients underwent regular follow-up for at least four years. The primary outcome was aneurysm instability (rupture, growth, and morphological change). ICA segments were classified per Bouthillier's. C7 bifurcation (Bifur), posterior communicating artery (Pcom), and others. The 4-year instability risk was analyzed by segment. Cox regression identified factors associated with instability. This study included 779 patients. During 3153 aneurysm-years of follow-up, aneurysm instability occurred in 21/29 (incidence rate [IR]: 25.94%; 95%CI, 15.63-36.26%) UIAs in the C7-Pcom, 18/62 (IR: 10.64%; 95%CI, 6.34-14.94%) UIAs in the C7-Bifur, 28/688 (IR: 0.97%; 95%CI, 0.61-1.32%) UIAs in other segments of ICAs. Multivariable analysis showed that UIAs located in the C7-Pcom(hazard ratio, 9.76; 95%CI, 5.39-17.67) and in the C7-Bifur (hazard ratio, 15.79; 95%CI, 8.54-29.19) were associated with instability of ICA UIAs. UIAs in the C7-Bifur/Pcom have substantially higher instability risks than those in other ICA segments. The precise anatomic location should be prioritized in risk evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40742576What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.