Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40742532›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2025

Robotic Sacrocolpopexy With Versus Without Supracervical Hysterectomy.

Alicia Blondeau, Margot Chommeloux, Camille Haudebert, Claire Richard, Alexandre Dubois, Juan Penafiel, Andrea Manunta, Juliette Hascoet, Benoit Peyronnet

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alicia BlondeauDepartment of Urology, University of Rennes, 2 Rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35000, Rennes, France. Blondeau.alicia@gmail.com.
Margot ChommelouxDepartment of Urology, University of Rennes, 2 Rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35000, Rennes, France.
Camille HaudebertDepartment of Urology, University of Rennes, 2 Rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35000, Rennes, France.
Claire RichardDepartment of Urology, University of Rennes, 2 Rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35000, Rennes, France.
Alexandre DuboisDepartment of Urology, University of Rennes, 2 Rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35000, Rennes, France.
Juan PenafielDepartment of Urology, University of Rennes, 2 Rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35000, Rennes, France.
Andrea ManuntaDepartment of Urology, University of Rennes, 2 Rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35000, Rennes, France.
Juliette HascoetDepartment of Urology, University of Rennes, 2 Rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35000, Rennes, France.
Benoit PeyronnetDepartment of Urology, University of Rennes, 2 Rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35000, Rennes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: After the age of 80, the cumulative incidence of surgery of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) exceeds 15%. While concomitant supracervical hysterectomy (SCH) is very popular at the time of sacrocolpopexy in some parts of the world, it is rarely performed in many European countries. The aim of the present study was to compare the outcomes of robotic sarcrocolpopexy with or without SCH.

methodsThe charts of all consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy for POP at a single center between 2013 and 2023 were included in a retrospective study. The remaining patients were included for analysis and divided in two groups: with (HYST) vs. without (no HYST) supracervical hysterectomy.

resultsOut of 197 minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy, 88 were included in the present analysis: 39 in the HYST group and 49 in the no-HYST group. The only statistically significant difference at baseline between the two groups was the higher proportion of grade 3 or 4 uterine prolapse in the HYST group (35.1% vs. 10.2%; p = 0.01). The postoperative complications rates were similar in both groups (16.7% vs. 18.4%; p = 0.84). After a median follow-up of 12 months, the subjective success rate was similar (96.6% vs. 92.2%; p = 0.44). Most outcomes were not significantly different.

conclusionsIn the present study, we did not demonstrate a benefit for SCH at the time of sacrocolpopexy. However, we did not observe an increased morbidity in the HYST group, suggesting that it may not exist anymore beyond the learning curve in the robotic era.

Indexed as

Gynecologic Surgical ProceduresHysterectomyPelvic Organ ProlapseRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSacrumTreatment OutcomeVaginaComplicationsMeshPelvic organ prolapseRoboticsSacrocolpopexy

Identifiers

PMID40742532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.