ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2025
Measurement properties of the PROMIS-29 profile v2.1 in a Norwegian rehabilitation context.
Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03764982 (RehabNytte - A Multi Center Study in Specialized Rehabilitation Centers in Norway Exploring Health, Function, Workability and Quality of Life Following Rehabilitation), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
RehabNytte - A Multi Center Study in Specialized Rehabilitation Centers in Norway Exploring Health, Function, Workability and Quality of Life Following Rehabilitation
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Specific and shared mechanisms mediating pain intensity and functional outcomes in chronic neck pain.Pain management · 2026Trial
- Analysis of Nursing Service Quality Gaps and Improvement Strategies in VIP General Wards Based on Patient-Reported Outcomes.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPsychometric properties of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System
methodsPatients receiving rehabilitation services participating in a longitudinal cohort study answered PROMIS-29 at baseline and at 3-month follow-up. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega. Construct validity was examined through hypothesis testing, using EQ-5D-5L as comparator measure. Hypotheses for correlations of change scores for both questionnaires were tested as an expression of responsiveness. Score distribution and floor/ceiling effects were examined with histograms and descriptive statistics.
resultsA total of 828 patients with a mean age of 54.3 years were included for analysis. The internal consistency for each PROMIS-29 domain was confirmed, with alpha and omega values exceeding the threshold of ≥ 0.70. Regarding correlations between PROMIS-29 and EQ-5D-5L, 34 out of 40 hypotheses were confirmed for construct validity and 19 out of 24 for responsiveness, both meeting our a priori criterion of ≥ 75% confirmed hypotheses. There was no floor effect of any PROMIS-29 domain in our sample, and ceiling effect only for anxiety and depression domain scores. Still, this confirmed the applicability of PROMIS-29 in a rehabilitation context.
conclusionThe Norwegian PROMIS-29 has sufficient internal consistency, construct validity and responsiveness for use as an outcome measure for health status and health-related quality of life in rehabilitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03764982 RehabNytte study, registered 2018-12-04.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.