ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Metagenomic next-generation sequencing and chromosomal copy number variation analysis in cerebrospinal fluid for the detection of meningeal carcinomatosis.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Amelanotic primary thalamic melanoma: a case report.BMC neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of copy number variations (CNVs) and metagenomic nextgeneration sequencing (mNGS) in identifying meningeal carcinomatosis (MC) within the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).
methodsPatients diagnosed with MC at Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, from January 2022 to January 2024, were prospectively enrolled. The diagnosis was confirmed via CSF cytology or meningeal biopsy, and a control group of encephalitis patients was used for comparative analysis. We introduced Onco-mNGS, a novel diagnostic protocol integrating mNGS with CNVs analysis to concurrently identify malignancies and pathogens from CSF specimens.
resultsThe study cohort comprised 12 patients with MC, predominantly with lung cancer. Initial CSF CNVs analysis yielded a sensitivity of 83%, with all control samples testing negative for CNVs, thereby achieving 100% specificity.
conclusionsCSF CNVs analysis, in combination with mNGS, presents a promising diagnostic modality for MC, offering high sensitivity and specificity and expanding the clinical utility of CSF mNGS in adjunctive diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40742499What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.