Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40742491›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025

Laparoscopic hepaticoduodenostomy for bilioenteric reconstruction: an experience.

Devendra Choudhary, B G Vageesh, Amit Javed, Anil K Agarwal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Devendra ChoudharyDepartment of GI Surgery, GB Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, JLN Marg, New Delhi, 110002, India.
B G VageeshDepartment of GI Surgery, GB Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, JLN Marg, New Delhi, 110002, India.
Amit JavedDepartment of GI Surgery, GB Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, JLN Marg, New Delhi, 110002, India.
Anil K AgarwalDepartment of GI Surgery, GB Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, JLN Marg, New Delhi, 110002, India. aka.hpb@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy is the commonly performed method of bilioenteric reconstruction and experience of hepaticoduodenostomy (HD) is limited. This study describes our experience of Laparoscopic HD (LHD) for bilioenteric reconstruction.

methodsA total of 125 patients who underwent LHD from January 2016 to June 2023 were included. Short- and long-term outcomes were analysed.

resultsLHD was feasible in 91.5% (86/94) of patients with CDC (Group 1) and 54.9% (39/71) of BBS (Group 2). The mean operative time, time to resume orally, and hospital stay were 210 min, 3 days, and 6 days, respectively. Mean operative blood loss was 95 ml. Post-operative bile leak was noted in 8% (10/125) patients. Median follow-up was 40 months. Clinically relevant bile reflux gastritis was not observed. McDonald grade D strictures were found in 5 (4%) patients, out of which two required redo surgery.

conclusionLHD is a safe and feasible method of bilioenteric reconstruction with acceptable short- and long-term outcomes. It can be used as a preferred method whenever feasible.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyAdultAgedAnastomosis, Roux-en-YFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansJejunostomyLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBiliary strictureBilioenteric anastomosisCholedochal cystHepaticoduodenostomyHepticojejunostomy

Identifiers

PMID40742491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.