ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025
Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus pelvic lymphadenectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective institutional review.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: a meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes and surgical morbidity.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the oncologic and survival outcomes in patients diagnosed with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent both sentinel lymph node (SLN) and pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLD) compared with those who underwent SLN alone at primary surgery.
methodsFrom 2001 to 2022, women who underwent SLN biopsy for nodal staging were recruited. The group of women who underwent SLN biopsy and PLD (SLN + PLD group) was compared with the group who underwent SLN mapping alone (SLN group).
results210 patients were evaluated (98 and 112 in each group). The overall SLN detection rate was 97.6%. Lymph node involvement was detected in 23 patients (11%), and the rate of positive SLN increased from 6.2 to 11% after final pathological examination. At a median follow-up of 80 months, the recurrence and mortality rates were 6.2 and 2.4%, respectively. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 93.7 and 97.2%, and the overall survival (OS) rate was 98.9 and 99.0% in the SLN + PLD and SLN group, respectively. There were no significant differences in the Kaplan-Meier PFS (p = 0.471; HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.22-2.04) and OS (p = 0.228; HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.03-2.53) curves between the groups.
conclusionPending further confirmation from prospective trials, SLN biopsy appears to be an effective method of nodal assessment in early-stage cervical cancer. This technique does not appear to increase the risk of recurrence compared with complete PLD in selected patients and may offer a viable, less invasive alternative for accurate nodal staging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.