Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40742446›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2025

Valid and efficient inference for nonparametric variable importance in two-phase studies.

Guorong Dai, Raymond J Carroll, Jinbo Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guorong DaiDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, School of Management, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3179-2541
Raymond J CarrollDepartment of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77840, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5465-9682
Jinbo ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.

Funding

Measurement Error, Nutrition, Physical Activity and CancerU01CA057030 · NCI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI CARROLL, RAYMOND J. · 2015 to 2019
$2.8M
Data and Information Integration for Risk Prediction in the Era of Big DataR01CA236468 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEN, JINBO · 2019 to 2024
$2.2M
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Electronic Health Record DataR01HL138306 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEN, JINBO · 2018 to 2020
$1.2M
Predictive Modeling with High-Dimensional lncomplete DataR01GM140463 · NIGMS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI GUO, ZIJIAN · 2020 to 2022
$560k
National Natural Science Foundation of China 12331009National Natural Science Foundation of China 12401342National Natural Science Foundation of China 72271060NCI NIH HHS R01 CA236468NCI NIH HHS U01 CA057030NCI NIH HHS U01-CA057030NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL138306NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM140463NIH HHS R01-CA236468NIH HHS R01-GM140463NIH HHS R01-HL138306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We consider a common nonparametric regression setting, where the data consist of a response variable Y, some easily obtainable covariates $\mathbf {X}$, and a set of costly covariates $\mathbf {Z}$. Before establishing predictive models for Y, a natural question arises: Is it worthwhile to include $\mathbf {Z}$ as predictors, given the additional cost of collecting data on $\mathbf {Z}$ for both training the models and predicting Y for future individuals? Therefore, we aim to conduct preliminary investigations to infer importance of $\mathbf {Z}$ in predicting Y in the presence of $\mathbf {X}$. To achieve this goal, we propose a nonparametric variable importance measure for $\mathbf {Z}$. It is defined as a parameter that aggregates maximum potential contributions of $\mathbf {Z}$ in single or multiple predictive models, with contributions quantified by general loss functions. Considering two-phase data that provide a large number of observations for $(Y,\mathbf {X})$ with the expensive $\mathbf {Z}$ measured only in a small subsample, we develop a novel approach to infer the proposed importance measure, accommodating missingness of $\mathbf {Z}$ in the sample by substituting functions of $(Y,\mathbf {X})$ for each individual's contribution to the predictive loss of models involving $\mathbf {Z}$. Our approach attains unified and efficient inference regardless of whether $\mathbf {Z}$ makes zero or positive contribution to predicting Y, a desirable yet surprising property owing to data incompleteness. As intermediate steps of our theoretical development, we establish novel results in two relevant research areas, semi-supervised inference and two-phase nonparametric estimation. Numerical results from both simulated and real data demonstrate superior performance of our approach.

Indexed as

BiometryModels, StatisticalComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansRegression AnalysisStatistics, Nonparametricnonparametric inferencestatistical efficiencytwo-phase samplingvariable importance

Identifiers

PMID40742446
PMCPMC12312401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.