Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40742442›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2026

[Ego documents of people with epilepsy during National Socialism].

T Baumann, A Karenberg, H Fangerau

Abstract readHistorical ArticleEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

T BaumannInstitut für Geschichte und Ethik der Medizin, Universität zu Köln, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Deutschland. timo.baumann@uni-duesseldorf.de.
A KarenbergInstitut für Geschichte und Ethik der Medizin, Universität zu Köln, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Deutschland.
H FangerauInstitut für Geschichte, Theorie und Ethik der Medizin, Medizinische Fakultät, Centre for Health and Society, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, Geb. 17.11 (Postfach 1114), 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with epilepsy were a stigmatized and persecuted group under National Socialism. Nevertheless, there are only a few historical works that specifically address the reality of life for this group in Nazi Germany.

objectiveIn the sense of a heuristic pioneer study, the reality of life of in-patients with epilepsy in a selected institution is systematically researched and presented. MATERIAL AND

methodsNumerous patient files from the Bonn sanatorium (Heil- und Pflege-Anstalt Bonn) were analyzed using the historical-critical method. Some of these files contain letters and other testimonies from the patients. This study concentrates on these ego documents and on letters from relatives.

resultsWhile coping with everyday life was central to the patients, some relatives were more concerned with the question of the hereditary nature of the epilepsy; others, who wanted to help their hospitalized relatives were increasingly unable to do so after 1939.

conclusionOnly an overall view of all types of sources in medical records (medical history forms, nursing reports, ego documents and letters from relatives), which has so far often been neglected, enables an approximate understanding of the situation of hospitalized patients with epilepsy during the National Socialist era and the post-war period.

Indexed as

DocumentationEgoEpilepsyMedical RecordsNational SocialismGermanyHistory, 20th CenturyHumans1933-1945Ego documentsEpilepsyMedical recordsPatients’ fates

Identifiers

PMID40742442
PMCPMC13171986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.