Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40742436›Full record

ArticleDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Severe anaphylaxis following administration of omalizumab].

Franziska Keidel, Priscila Wölbing, Knut Schäkel

Abstract readCase ReportsEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Franziska KeidelUniversitäts-Hautklinik Heidelberg, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. franziska.keidel@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Priscila WölbingHautarztpraxis Wölbing, Darmstädter Str. 226-228, 64625, Bensheim, Deutschland.
Knut SchäkelUniversitäts-Hautklinik Heidelberg, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A patient with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) received treatment with the monoclonal antibody omalizumab, which resulted in significant clinical improvement but repeatedly triggered severe anaphylactic reactions. These occurred both after administration of the medication and during a prick test. The exact mechanisms behind the reactions are unclear; possible causes could include additives such as polysorbate 20 or specific antibodies. The case highlights the rare but serious risk of anaphylaxis with omalizumab and emphasizes the need for close monitoring and emergency preparedness.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisAnti-Allergic AgentsChronic UrticariaOmalizumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnti-Allergic AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedOmalizumabAnaphylaxisChronic spontaneous urticariaOmalizumabPolysorbate 20Prick test

Identifiers

PMID40742436
PMCPMC12413407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.